public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Caleb Sander Mateos <[email protected]>
To: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	 [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected],  Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 07/11] io_uring: add support for kernel registered bvecs
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 12:58:43 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADUfDZreF+YLLkE4Z+UniVXBo7HRm9nTd+O9yRVqJ9STpFJaJA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:31 PM Keith Busch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
>
> Provide an interface for the kernel to leverage the existing
> pre-registered buffers that io_uring provides. User space can reference
> these later to achieve zero-copy IO.
>
> User space must register an empty fixed buffer table with io_uring in
> order for the kernel to make use of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
> ---
>  include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h |   7 ++
>  io_uring/rsrc.c              | 123 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  io_uring/rsrc.h              |   8 +++
>  3 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h b/include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h
> index 87150dc0a07cf..cf8d80d847344 100644
> --- a/include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/io_uring/cmd.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>
>  #include <uapi/linux/io_uring.h>
>  #include <linux/io_uring_types.h>
> +#include <linux/blk-mq.h>
>
>  /* only top 8 bits of sqe->uring_cmd_flags for kernel internal use */
>  #define IORING_URING_CMD_CANCELABLE    (1U << 30)
> @@ -125,4 +126,10 @@ static inline struct io_uring_cmd_data *io_uring_cmd_get_async_data(struct io_ur
>         return cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd)->async_data;
>  }
>
> +int io_buffer_register_bvec(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, struct request *rq,
> +                           void (*release)(void *), unsigned int index,
> +                           unsigned int issue_flags);
> +void io_buffer_unregister_bvec(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int index,
> +                              unsigned int issue_flags);
> +
>  #endif /* _LINUX_IO_URING_CMD_H */
> diff --git a/io_uring/rsrc.c b/io_uring/rsrc.c
> index f814526982c36..e0c6ed3aef5b5 100644
> --- a/io_uring/rsrc.c
> +++ b/io_uring/rsrc.c
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
>  #include <linux/compat.h>
>  #include <linux/io_uring.h>
> +#include <linux/io_uring/cmd.h>
>
>  #include <uapi/linux/io_uring.h>
>
> @@ -104,14 +105,21 @@ int io_buffer_validate(struct iovec *iov)
>  static void io_buffer_unmap(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_rsrc_node *node)
>  {
>         struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu = node->buf;
> -       unsigned int i;
>
>         if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&imu->refs))
>                 return;
> -       for (i = 0; i < imu->nr_bvecs; i++)
> -               unpin_user_page(imu->bvec[i].bv_page);
> -       if (imu->acct_pages)
> -               io_unaccount_mem(ctx, imu->acct_pages);
> +
> +       if (imu->release) {
> +               imu->release(imu->priv);
> +       } else {
> +               unsigned int i;
> +
> +               for (i = 0; i < imu->nr_bvecs; i++)
> +                       unpin_user_page(imu->bvec[i].bv_page);
> +               if (imu->acct_pages)
> +                       io_unaccount_mem(ctx, imu->acct_pages);
> +       }
> +
>         kvfree(imu);
>  }
>
> @@ -761,6 +769,9 @@ static struct io_rsrc_node *io_sqe_buffer_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
>         imu->len = iov->iov_len;
>         imu->nr_bvecs = nr_pages;
>         imu->folio_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
> +       imu->release = NULL;
> +       imu->priv = NULL;
> +       imu->perm = IO_IMU_READABLE | IO_IMU_WRITEABLE;
>         if (coalesced)
>                 imu->folio_shift = data.folio_shift;
>         refcount_set(&imu->refs, 1);
> @@ -857,6 +868,95 @@ int io_sqe_buffers_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> +int io_buffer_register_bvec(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, struct request *rq,
> +                           void (*release)(void *), unsigned int index,
> +                           unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> +       struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd)->ctx;
> +       struct io_rsrc_data *data = &ctx->buf_table;
> +       struct req_iterator rq_iter;
> +       struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu;
> +       struct io_rsrc_node *node;
> +       struct bio_vec bv, *bvec;
> +       u16 nr_bvecs;
> +       int ret = 0;
> +
> +
> +       io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
> +       if (index >= data->nr) {
> +               ret = -EINVAL;
> +               goto unlock;
> +       }
> +       index = array_index_nospec(index, data->nr);
> +
> +       if (data->nodes[index] ) {

nit: extra space before )

> +               ret = -EBUSY;
> +               goto unlock;
> +       }
> +
> +       node = io_rsrc_node_alloc(IORING_RSRC_BUFFER);
> +       if (!node) {
> +               ret = -ENOMEM;
> +               goto unlock;
> +       }
> +
> +       nr_bvecs = blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq);
> +       imu = kvmalloc(struct_size(imu, bvec, nr_bvecs), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!imu) {
> +               kfree(node);
> +               ret = -ENOMEM;
> +               goto unlock;
> +       }
> +
> +       imu->ubuf = 0;
> +       imu->len = blk_rq_bytes(rq);
> +       imu->acct_pages = 0;
> +       imu->folio_shift = PAGE_SHIFT;
> +       imu->nr_bvecs = nr_bvecs;
> +       refcount_set(&imu->refs, 1);
> +       imu->release = release;
> +       imu->priv = rq;
> +
> +       if (op_is_write(req_op(rq)))
> +               imu->perm = IO_IMU_WRITEABLE;
> +       else
> +               imu->perm = IO_IMU_READABLE;

imu->perm = 1 << rq_data_dir(rq); ?

> +
> +       bvec = imu->bvec;
> +       rq_for_each_bvec(bv, rq, rq_iter)
> +               *bvec++ = bv;
> +
> +       node->buf = imu;
> +       data->nodes[index] = node;
> +unlock:
> +       io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_buffer_register_bvec);
> +
> +void io_buffer_unregister_bvec(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int index,
> +                              unsigned int issue_flags)
> +{
> +       struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = cmd_to_io_kiocb(cmd)->ctx;
> +       struct io_rsrc_data *data = &ctx->buf_table;
> +       struct io_rsrc_node *node;
> +
> +       io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
> +       if (index >= data->nr)
> +               goto unlock;
> +       index = array_index_nospec(index, data->nr);
> +
> +       node = data->nodes[index];
> +       if (!node || !node->buf->release)
> +               goto unlock;

Would it be useful to return some error code in these cases so
userspace can tell that the unregistration parameters were invalid?

Best,
Caleb


> +
> +       io_put_rsrc_node(ctx, node);
> +       data->nodes[index] = NULL;
> +unlock:
> +       io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_buffer_unregister_bvec);
> +
>  static int io_import_fixed(int ddir, struct iov_iter *iter,
>                            struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu,
>                            u64 buf_addr, size_t len)
> @@ -871,6 +971,8 @@ static int io_import_fixed(int ddir, struct iov_iter *iter,
>         /* not inside the mapped region */
>         if (unlikely(buf_addr < imu->ubuf || buf_end > (imu->ubuf + imu->len)))
>                 return -EFAULT;
> +       if (!(imu->perm & (1 << ddir)))
> +               return -EFAULT;
>
>         /*
>          * Might not be a start of buffer, set size appropriately
> @@ -883,8 +985,8 @@ static int io_import_fixed(int ddir, struct iov_iter *iter,
>                 /*
>                  * Don't use iov_iter_advance() here, as it's really slow for
>                  * using the latter parts of a big fixed buffer - it iterates
> -                * over each segment manually. We can cheat a bit here, because
> -                * we know that:
> +                * over each segment manually. We can cheat a bit here for user
> +                * registered nodes, because we know that:
>                  *
>                  * 1) it's a BVEC iter, we set it up
>                  * 2) all bvecs are the same in size, except potentially the
> @@ -898,8 +1000,15 @@ static int io_import_fixed(int ddir, struct iov_iter *iter,
>                  */
>                 const struct bio_vec *bvec = imu->bvec;
>
> +               /*
> +                * Kernel buffer bvecs, on the other hand, don't necessarily
> +                * have the size property of user registered ones, so we have
> +                * to use the slow iter advance.
> +                */
>                 if (offset < bvec->bv_len) {
>                         iter->iov_offset = offset;
> +               } else if (imu->release) {
> +                       iov_iter_advance(iter, offset);
>                 } else {
>                         unsigned long seg_skip;
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/rsrc.h b/io_uring/rsrc.h
> index f0e9080599646..64bf35667cf9c 100644
> --- a/io_uring/rsrc.h
> +++ b/io_uring/rsrc.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ struct io_rsrc_node {
>         };
>  };
>
> +enum {
> +       IO_IMU_READABLE         = 1 << 0,
> +       IO_IMU_WRITEABLE        = 1 << 1,
> +};
> +
>  struct io_mapped_ubuf {
>         u64             ubuf;
>         unsigned int    len;
> @@ -27,6 +32,9 @@ struct io_mapped_ubuf {
>         unsigned int    folio_shift;
>         refcount_t      refs;
>         unsigned long   acct_pages;
> +       void            (*release)(void *);
> +       void            *priv;
> +       u8              perm;
>         struct bio_vec  bvec[] __counted_by(nr_bvecs);
>  };
>
> --
> 2.43.5
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-25 20:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-24 21:31 [PATCHv5 00/11] ublk zero copy support Keith Busch
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 01/11] io_uring/rsrc: remove redundant check for valid imu Keith Busch
2025-02-25  8:37   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 13:13   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 02/11] io_uring/nop: reuse req->buf_index Keith Busch
2025-02-24 23:30   ` Jens Axboe
2025-02-25  0:02     ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25  8:43   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 13:13   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 03/11] io_uring/net: reuse req->buf_index for sendzc Keith Busch
2025-02-25  8:44   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 13:14   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 04/11] io_uring/nvme: pass issue_flags to io_uring_cmd_import_fixed() Keith Busch
2025-02-25  8:52   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 05/11] io_uring: combine buffer lookup and import Keith Busch
2025-02-25  8:55   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 06/11] io_uring/rw: move fixed buffer import to issue path Keith Busch
2025-02-25  9:26   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 13:57   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 20:57   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-02-25 21:16     ` Keith Busch
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 07/11] io_uring: add support for kernel registered bvecs Keith Busch
2025-02-25  9:40   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 17:32     ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25 22:47       ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 22:55         ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25 14:00   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 14:05     ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 20:58   ` Caleb Sander Mateos [this message]
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 08/11] nvme: map uring_cmd data even if address is 0 Keith Busch
2025-02-25  9:41   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 09/11] ublk: zc register/unregister bvec Keith Busch
2025-02-25 11:00   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 16:35     ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25 22:56       ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 16:19   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 16:27     ` Keith Busch
2025-02-25 16:42       ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 16:52         ` Keith Busch
2025-02-27  4:16           ` Ming Lei
2025-02-25 21:14   ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-02-26  8:15   ` Ming Lei
2025-02-26 17:10     ` Keith Busch
2025-02-27  4:19       ` Ming Lei
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 10/11] io_uring: add abstraction for buf_table rsrc data Keith Busch
2025-02-25 16:04   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-24 21:31 ` [PATCHv5 11/11] io_uring: cache nodes and mapped buffers Keith Busch
2025-02-25 13:11   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 14:10 ` [PATCHv5 00/11] ublk zero copy support Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-25 14:47   ` Jens Axboe
2025-02-25 15:07 ` (subset) " Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CADUfDZreF+YLLkE4Z+UniVXBo7HRm9nTd+O9yRVqJ9STpFJaJA@mail.gmail.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox