public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@purestorage.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: remove WRITE_ONCE() in io_uring_create()
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2025 20:32:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADUfDZrpJuq7QH47XTBvCFsENm88WQGX2YYnEPHat_UD6nLC=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28b5e071-70f2-4f46-86af-11879be0f2a4@kernel.dk>

On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 6:20 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> wrote:
>
> On 9/2/25 3:51 PM, Caleb Sander Mateos wrote:
> > There's no need to use WRITE_ONCE() to set ctx->submitter_task in
> > io_uring_create() since no other thread can access the io_ring_ctx until
> > a file descriptor is associated with it. So use a normal assignment
> > instead of WRITE_ONCE().
>
> Would probably warrant a code comment to that effect, as just reading
> the code would be slightly confusing after this.

Could you elaborate on why you find it confusing? I wouldn't expect to
see WRITE_ONCE() or any other atomic operation used when initializing
memory prior to it being made accessible from other threads. It looks
like commit 8579538c89e3 ("io_uring/msg_ring: fix remote queue to
disabled ring") added the WRITE_ONCE() both here and in
io_register_enable_rings(). But it's only needed in
io_register_enable_rings(), where the io_ring_ctx already has an
associated file descriptor and may be accessed concurrently from
multiple threads.

Thanks,
Caleb

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-03  3:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-02 21:51 [PATCH] io_uring: remove WRITE_ONCE() in io_uring_create() Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-09-03  1:20 ` Jens Axboe
2025-09-03  3:32   ` Caleb Sander Mateos [this message]
2025-09-03 23:16     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADUfDZrpJuq7QH47XTBvCFsENm88WQGX2YYnEPHat_UD6nLC=A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=csander@purestorage.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox