From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20123C433ED for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 15:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B8461359 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 15:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231941AbhEBPCI (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 May 2021 11:02:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53848 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230110AbhEBPCI (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 May 2021 11:02:08 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F951C06174A; Sun, 2 May 2021 08:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id 12so4319298lfq.13; Sun, 02 May 2021 08:01:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=2KrJJUJkSjKMGeIgnhlr8UaRUqJR8X3RnPrqNiC5mho=; b=gFpp31vhRno67oZ4qs1YYGLJCCTVCfnOGHW6AeZAcHDLKNdY2RPaiYUL+qww7iBvdp jLPJZR2ir6RBZxAn9IkxscTG0x5PLLdeUGFU0HaTrKJU6NhaLzuzR8GtJih0Zay0yUqK xlwEp3NymZVwlXmFq3Coum9BqZvX1nSqEGdlLXoSZhdNnrDIb7YgRChwl1H48Kw950wk EpEH01jDYl936uMPkDNvbpLitjN0p7WXPr792CCe/I8CF79JBbzoGC/C9gNJGLPDxft5 8ZL7ONYqAUmnaGlqg7hkVIlavpJLa1djBsTt3+MfTfvUDpNARk8viamqzjW5nYPzY0eM Qjow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2KrJJUJkSjKMGeIgnhlr8UaRUqJR8X3RnPrqNiC5mho=; b=sWukIZNp/iiBD64pMAgWuHu7tGtGMee3RJfBp7M4E0lYw2PXEGyJKTQ6Jl/Cb4UZzk rqS/SSjg+Ok83aznA9ioT0vErg0896KmeJ9Se0dSlDbvme2aMZlvpZPBkiX1uid7CykR cq+4eFgu/G1r5I/hepSxeZqlvW+lHk79mkCmR1TlYZILYDl+hHMZDUJP+RQHvEAxndSI DED84wSV4bKjPLYmIMoUdwCHpXaPVNNVyJ0psyDi3tSxVTyl214x898jXt1D0wKpf5Ua ikdCXJm8U3IcunUrS367gkRdGw5tNvI5Xy9otLKgGcAtB3B19/pNcLWc+W/qFGvDYY57 90pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532CU/AmN5ZqRWM01MsvjRAMkeJjydWuozYIg3X8BLi6prZuECba 3nlwIOrl85G2SNtSWPgh0SN7O3qkJLqxT7Ylx74= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydayfR18ybm6VTswWed5R8D/ew2zWIfn3GUoTqFZCZo9BBctr6FNlV6QNW1n9QjAIov6GEFwsqj4msg1qmLTA= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3b07:: with SMTP id f7mr10498383lfv.470.1619967674845; Sun, 02 May 2021 08:01:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <0000000000000c97e505bdd1d60e@google.com> <53a22ab4-7a2d-4ebd-802d-9d1b4ce4e087n@googlegroups.com> <12e84e19-a803-25e3-7d15-d105b56d15b6@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <12e84e19-a803-25e3-7d15-d105b56d15b6@gmail.com> From: Palash Oswal Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 20:31:03 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in io_uring_cancel_sqpoll To: Pavel Begunkov , Hillf Danton Cc: Jens Axboe , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, LKML , syzbot+11bf59db879676f59e52@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 4:04 PM Pavel Begunkov wrote: > > I tested against the HEAD b1ef997bec4d5cf251bfb5e47f7b04afa49bcdfe > > However, there is a bunch patches fixing sqpoll cancellations in > 5.13, all are waiting for backporting. and for-next doesn't trigger > the issue for me. > > Are you absolutely sure b1ef997bec4d5cf251bfb5e47f7b04afa49bcdfe > does hit it? > > > commit on for-next tree > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git/?h=for-next > > and the reproducer fails. Hi Pavel and Hillf, I believe there's a little misunderstanding, apologies. The reproducer does not trigger the bug on the for-next tree which has patches for 5.13. The reproducer process exits correctly. Likely one of those commits that will be back-ported to 5.12 will address this issue. When I wrote `the reproducer fails`, I meant to indicate that the bug is not triggered on for-next. I will word it better next time! Palash