From: Paul Moore <[email protected]>
To: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Ankit Kumar <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:10:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhRXAVCdGrDt8nSLwuCJdCESSHVgo_T4=j41yB00b7w76w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 3:04 PM Casey Schaufler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8/26/2022 11:59 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 12:53 PM Casey Schaufler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On 8/26/2022 8:15 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 8:07 PM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> On 8/23/22 6:05 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 7:46 PM Casey Schaufler <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>> Limit io_uring "cmd" options to files for which the caller has
> >>>>>> Smack read access. There may be cases where the cmd option may
> >>>>>> be closer to a write access than a read, but there is no way
> >>>>>> to make that determination.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> >>>>>> index 001831458fa2..bffccdc494cb 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> >>>>> ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> @@ -4732,6 +4733,36 @@ static int smack_uring_sqpoll(void)
> >>>>>> return -EPERM;
> >>>>>> }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +/**
> >>>>>> + * smack_uring_cmd - check on file operations for io_uring
> >>>>>> + * @ioucmd: the command in question
> >>>>>> + *
> >>>>>> + * Make a best guess about whether a io_uring "command" should
> >>>>>> + * be allowed. Use the same logic used for determining if the
> >>>>>> + * file could be opened for read in the absence of better criteria.
> >>>>>> + */
> >>>>>> +static int smack_uring_cmd(struct io_uring_cmd *ioucmd)
> >>>>>> +{
> >>>>>> + struct file *file = ioucmd->file;
> >>>>>> + struct smk_audit_info ad;
> >>>>>> + struct task_smack *tsp;
> >>>>>> + struct inode *inode;
> >>>>>> + int rc;
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> + if (!file)
> >>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>> Perhaps this is a better question for Jens, but ioucmd->file is always
> >>>>> going to be valid when the LSM hook is called, yes?
> >>>> file will always be valid for uring commands, as they are marked as
> >>>> requiring a file. If no valid fd is given for it, it would've been
> >>>> errored early on, before reaching f_op->uring_cmd().
> >>> Hey Casey, where do things stand with this patch? To be specific, did
> >>> you want me to include this in the lsm/stable-6.0 PR for Linus or are
> >>> you planning to send it separately? If you want me to send it up, are
> >>> you planning another revision?
> >>>
> >>> There is no right or wrong answer here as far as I'm concerned, I'm
> >>> just trying to make sure we are all on the same page.
> >> I think the whole LSM fix for io_uring looks better the more complete
> >> it is. I don't see the Smack check changing until such time as there's
> >> better information available to make decisions upon. If you send it along
> >> with the rest of the patch set I think we'll have done our best.
> > Okay, will do. Would you like me to tag the patch with the 'Fixes:'
> > and stable tags, similar to the LSM and SELinux patches?
>
> Yes, I think that's best.
Done and merged to lsm/stable-6.0. I'm going to let the automated
stuff do it's thing and assuming no problems I'll plan to send it to
Linus on Monday ... sending stuff like this last thing on a Friday is
a little too risky for my tastes.
--
paul-moore.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20220719135821epcas5p1b071b0162cc3e1eb803ca687989f106d@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-07-19 13:52 ` [PATCH liburing 0/5] Add basic test for nvme uring passthrough commands Ankit Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20220719135832epcas5p31bb7df7c931aba12454b6f16c966a7c8@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-07-19 13:52 ` [PATCH liburing 1/5] configure: check for nvme uring command support Ankit Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20220719135834epcas5p2f63a49277322756394f19e23a1c4e4ce@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-07-19 13:52 ` [PATCH liburing 2/5] io_uring.h: sync sqe entry with 5.20 io_uring Ankit Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20220719135835epcas5p2284cbb16a28c4290d3a886449bc7a6d8@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-07-19 13:52 ` [PATCH liburing 3/5] nvme: add nvme opcodes, structures and helper functions Ankit Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20220719135836epcas5p3f28b20cab964ced538d5a7fdfe367bb4@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-07-19 13:52 ` [PATCH liburing 4/5] test: add io_uring passthrough test Ankit Kumar
[not found] ` <CGME20220719135837epcas5p1eb4beb20bdfbdaaa7409d7b1f6355909@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-07-19 13:52 ` [PATCH liburing 5/5] test/io_uring_passthrough: add test case for poll IO Ankit Kumar
2022-08-12 0:43 ` [PATCH liburing 0/5] Add basic test for nvme uring passthrough commands Casey Schaufler
2022-08-12 1:51 ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-12 15:33 ` Paul Moore
2022-08-12 16:03 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-08-13 11:35 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-08-23 23:46 ` [PATCH] Smack: Provide read control for io_uring_cmd Casey Schaufler
2022-08-24 0:05 ` Paul Moore
2022-08-24 0:07 ` Jens Axboe
2022-08-26 15:15 ` Paul Moore
2022-08-26 16:53 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-08-26 18:59 ` Paul Moore
2022-08-26 19:04 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-08-26 19:10 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2022-08-26 19:31 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-08-27 15:59 ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-08-29 16:20 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-08-30 13:08 ` Joel Granados
2022-08-30 14:16 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-08-31 7:15 ` Joel Granados
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHC9VhRXAVCdGrDt8nSLwuCJdCESSHVgo_T4=j41yB00b7w76w@mail.gmail.com' \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox