Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] lsm,io_uring: add LSM hooks for io_uring_setup()

[Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>]

On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 12:18 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> On 1/27/2025 7:57 AM, Hamza Mahfooz wrote:
> > It is desirable to allow LSM to configure accessibility to io_uring
> > because it is a coarse yet very simple way to restrict access to it. So,
> > add an LSM for io_uring_allowed() to guard access to io_uring.
>
> I don't like this at all at all. It looks like you're putting in a hook
> so that io_uring can easily deflect any responsibility for safely
> interacting with LSMs.

That's not how this works Casey, unless you're seeing something different?

This is an additional access control point for io_uring, largely to
simplify what a LSM would need to do to help control a process' access
to io_uring, it does not replace any of the io_uring LSM hooks or
access control points.

-- 
paul-moore.com