From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com (mail-lf1-f42.google.com [209.85.167.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5D54167DB7 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 14:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.42 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755698410; cv=none; b=I4Klg0n3O7vNf7nP5RipucHRrWSbf+BLBsNe0g0ZjdPxjq0CmqieChyw4vgzsoiuHdDMETX+bHQ99yTQ01wFCXJeT9tykV/1GMzcExT5Gr7JLaEznwfiIXNNCFzduY32VDQnlJn3QFrSPyToHm2WdZKuKLcjsDSszlFZjFVI5/w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755698410; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WTD3/ArXFBvcXWRDIaLDjP6fA0+AfFc2iGlvvPf8jQA=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=kZbFxoXxb017HBo0MdN4wN36lIGqdcVRccWNSSPQtDt/1Xxtwr0ecns14H9pl5GbPDwEYYrLSa/bpvKD3EdmpUon3hqycsosVdsAqQV2DE41F/sc8loRqF3hJfbF7WsJiSr5Aik7qAX6Ekp/I71iz53YUWlVXs4xlr6iiMDEzQM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=hxp9UyiO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.167.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="hxp9UyiO" Received: by mail-lf1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-55cc715d0easo10568e87.0 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 07:00:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1755698407; x=1756303207; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=WTD3/ArXFBvcXWRDIaLDjP6fA0+AfFc2iGlvvPf8jQA=; b=hxp9UyiORUwzO3jg5zMSmwkvUk2XC+RuwZQZY6RH3kOfP74k9piTU2SDfy5SMonw54 xi0Sg9lyFGWv8ZXHz0LTVgCEJBfT9QsovoCdxUuuKml15ApGEYqpjnnwW+teki3OPWEQ SaiqegaHkCMRDL3TgQHr6SNakXvPJ+iH5942/I6ADMhC60x62d7znnu8JCloA2vByYoF uT0oCy2j3uNjZPCZ0T/+nQE604Z9amPZ6GBpmx2Slz7fPVdv//48uRQaT0m0FS10AwIC 54BwnofxXJzqc1fkjDi2hiZgGNCxdEjKfum9BqNWqwi+/G732MNHrUjDYCh0CVFzqzA7 u4+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1755698407; x=1756303207; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=WTD3/ArXFBvcXWRDIaLDjP6fA0+AfFc2iGlvvPf8jQA=; b=Bqsi2nou6ouA1BivmI8+SdkvTgWLmGT0+B2+H1mXCSfcVc6mRBqRTgjz+ZiGe+VtZ7 J07QNFL56ZW4WkNnX7YqT0m2OjfK+hyXYSu8du95+P8/5DmnmXpr9tlCJTw9WjhQNevA b0Ft0N9rOiUukLgXB7XpZkBfN+areM013M+ZGTfGmXj0kuOdM5eFsG/auqXr1cVbeL5c OlIB6l7Eu13Qnf0fCPKnoUnuvNEE7Hx+LJvRzs8aWQzYd19JLsWbFkGRaaOaBZjpUiD5 XiXra7n0abIs9YVBJlvOSwnZoEUn4hQxop4Fzs85mrxWicFF/lrY13mT+YIceDIpjFYp 6bJg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXi36r6UC4XCehFLKcjiOfFdR7FG/mkHL9Hglb+6JmO8WOG2YsSWUz+4voNVSSPJFOHehkpmPiPkA==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwvD5QFjEZY4grxXwXC/oqH1R9fujMtxjegBCA276NgPBjZziEs jQY/UuI9kJ5We5i1fa1Vomz9gdFVWPaYR59UjNliQ7n9a4rVX3uhSym61FGIBkpRy0js5H9U/Fc lub3i4nkJz18ncl0F2BvU7a0TPQx8cWCi0pY/86vj X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsCWyxmdJZyLiKZFLW3P2TwQh8JFTdY6DeDERFXR6y9RR7+I/ojq8RX79/eNpq dZW/A6U9DE1jWIPuN472fxluwRZgPWIkH7nIxI7HEglOCUK+KVyXoD9j2Rr380XE0fV8Db1MqFc Cx4aJ34BAN+eCaenyfRqBSqmJIeO53mL4FJBoQxp84voGyN7Br X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGlXQFrW/JI848HnlpaOFMG5uQo1vUXrwNovg/X/oPwBt3lyo06OZeyIWxfa7ULckeb9isVS2e26W/w+7wcCKk= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:4388:b0:55c:df56:f936 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-55e06818947mr351070e87.6.1755698404574; Wed, 20 Aug 2025 07:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250819193126.2a4af62b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: From: Mina Almasry Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 06:59:51 -0700 X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXyn3WeKsZNiJ_eN0Aeg_Ps8KKgTYMmuYPbod81uJ5k4iGCaZzxEQKmNVk8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 00/23][pull request] Queue configs and large buffer providers To: Pavel Begunkov Cc: Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , Willem de Bruijn , Paolo Abeni , andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, sdf@fomichev.me, dw@davidwei.uk, michael.chan@broadcom.com, dtatulea@nvidia.com, ap420073@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 6:38=E2=80=AFAM Pavel Begunkov wrote: > > On 8/20/25 03:31, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:57:16 +0100 Pavel Begunkov wrote: > >> Jakub Kicinski (20): > > > > I think we need to revisit how we operate. > > When we started the ZC work w/ io-uring I suggested a permanent shared > > branch. That's perhaps an overkill. What I did not expect is that you > > will not even CC netdev@ on changes to io_uring/zcrx.* > > > > I don't mean to assert any sort of ownership of that code, but you're > > not meeting basic collaboration standards for the kernel. This needs > > to change first. > > You're throwing quite allegations. Basic collaboration standards don't > include spamming people with unrelated changes via an already busy list. > I cc'ed netdev on patches that meaningfully change how it interacts > (incl indirectly) with netdev and/or might be of interest, which is > beyond of the usual standard expected of a project using infrastructure > provided by a subsystem. There are pieces that don't touch netdev, like > how io_uring pins pages, accounts memory, sets up rings, etc. In the > very same way generic io_uring patches are not normally posted to > netdev, and netdev patches are not redirected to mm because there > are kmalloc calls, even though, it's not even the standard used here. > > If you have some way you want to work, I'd appreciate a clear > indication of that, because that message you mentioned was answered > and I've never heard any objection, or anything else really. > We could use tags in the MAINTAINERS file similar to these: F: include/linux/*fence.h F: include/linux/dma-buf.h F: include/linux/dma-resv.h K: \bdma_(?:buf|fence|resv)\b We could make sure anything touching io_uring/zcrx. and anything using netmem_ref/net_iov goes to netdev. I think roughly adding something like this to general networking entry? F: io_uring/zcrx.* K: \bnet(mem_ref|_iov)\b I had suggested this before but never had time to suggest the actual changes, and in the back of my mind was a bit weary of spamming the maintainers, but it seems this is not as much a concern as the patches not getting to netdev. --=20 Thanks, Mina