From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
To: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Manfred Spraul <[email protected]>,
"David S. Miller" <[email protected]>,
Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
WangYuli <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] poll_wait: add mb() to fix theoretical race between waitqueue_active() and .poll()
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 09:38:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgvpziaLOTNV9cbitHXf7Lz0ZAW+gstacZqJqRqR8h66A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 08:27, Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I misread fs/eventpoll.c, it has the same problem. And more __pollwait()-like
> functions, for example p9_pollwait(). So 1/5 adds mb() into poll_wait(), not
> into __pollwait().
Ack on all five patches, looks sane to me.
Christian, I'm assuming this goes through your tree? If not, holler,
and I can take it directly.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-07 17:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-07 16:26 [PATCH 0/5] poll_wait: add mb() to fix theoretical race between waitqueue_active() and .poll() Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-07 16:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-07 16:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] poll_wait: kill the obsolete wait_address check Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-07 16:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] io_uring_poll: kill the no longer necessary barrier after poll_wait() Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-07 16:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] sock_poll_wait: " Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-07 16:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] poll: kill poll_does_not_wait() Oleg Nesterov
2025-01-07 17:38 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2025-01-07 22:55 ` [PATCH 0/5] poll_wait: add mb() to fix theoretical race between waitqueue_active() and .poll() Jens Axboe
2025-01-10 10:56 ` Christian Brauner
2025-01-10 11:00 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wgvpziaLOTNV9cbitHXf7Lz0ZAW+gstacZqJqRqR8h66A@mail.gmail.com' \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox