From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
To: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] io_uring updates for 5.18-rc1
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 11:09:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiTyisXBgKnVHAGYCNvkmjk=50agS2Uk6nr+n3ssLZg2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:59 PM Olivier Langlois
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Again, the io_uring napi busy_poll integration is strongly inspired
> from epoll implementation which caches a single napi_id.
Note that since epoll is the worst possible implementation of a
horribly bad idea, and one of the things I would really want people to
kill off, that "it's designed based on epoll" is about the worst
possible explanation fo anything at all.
Epoll is the CVS of kernel interfaces: look at it, cry, run away, and
try to avoid making that mistake ever again.
I'm looking forward to the day when we can just delete all epoll code,
but io_uring may be a making that even worse, in how it has then
exposed epoll as an io_uring operation. That was probably a *HORRIBLE*
mistake.
(For the two prime issues with epoll: epoll recursion and the
completely invalid expectations of what an "edge" in the edge
triggering is. But there are other mistakes in there, with the
lifetime of the epoll waitqueues having been nasty problems several
times, because of how it doesn't follow any of the normal poll()
rules, and made a mockery of any sane interfaces).
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-01 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-18 21:59 [GIT PULL] io_uring updates for 5.18-rc1 Jens Axboe
2022-03-22 0:25 ` pr-tracker-bot
2022-03-26 19:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-26 19:47 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-26 20:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-26 20:57 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-26 21:06 ` Jens Axboe
2022-03-26 21:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-30 23:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-31 0:44 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-01 6:59 ` Olivier Langlois
2022-06-01 16:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-01 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2022-06-01 18:21 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-01 18:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-06-01 18:34 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-01 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-06-01 19:10 ` Jens Axboe
2022-06-01 19:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-16 15:53 ` Deprecation of IORING_OP_EPOLL_CTL (Re: [GIT PULL] io_uring updates for 5.18-rc1) Stefan Metzmacher
2022-06-01 8:01 ` [GIT PULL] io_uring updates for 5.18-rc1 Olivier Langlois
2022-06-01 6:58 ` Olivier Langlois
2022-06-01 6:58 ` Olivier Langlois
2022-06-01 17:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHk-=wiTyisXBgKnVHAGYCNvkmjk=50agS2Uk6nr+n3ssLZg2w@mail.gmail.com' \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox