public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
To: Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
	[email protected],
	 "Andreas K. Huettel" <[email protected]>,
	Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>,
	 Huacai Chen <[email protected]>,
	Mateusz Guzik <[email protected]>,
	 Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
	Jan Kara <[email protected]>,
	[email protected],  [email protected],
	[email protected],  Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vfs: support statx(..., NULL, AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 10:40:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjH3F1jTVfADgo0tAnYStuaUZLvz+1NkmtM-TqiuubWcw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 at 10:30, Xi Ruoyao <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> struct stat64 {
>
> // ...
>
>     int     st_atime;   /* Time of last access.  */

Oh wow. Shows just *how* long ago that was - and how long ago I looked
at 32-bit code. Because clearly, I was wrong.

I guess it shows how nobody actually cares about 32-bit any more, at
least in the 2037 sense.

The point stands, though - statx isn't a replacement for existing binaries.

             Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-03 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-25 11:00 [PATCH 0/2] statx NULL path support Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 11:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: add CLASS fd_raw Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 12:22   ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-25 13:13     ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 11:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfs: support statx(..., NULL, AT_EMPTY_PATH, ...) Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 13:24   ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-25 13:28     ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-25 13:28     ` Mateusz Guzik
2024-06-25 14:09   ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-25 14:58     ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-30  1:40       ` Huacai Chen
2024-06-30  2:39         ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-06-30 13:18           ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-01 11:59           ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-02 15:36             ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-02 17:06               ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-03  4:30                 ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-03  8:45                 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03  9:35                   ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-03 10:07                     ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-03 16:31                   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 16:54                     ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-03 17:09                       ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 17:30                         ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-03 17:40                           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2024-07-03 17:54                             ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 18:14                               ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 18:39                                 ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 19:00                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 19:18                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 18:48                               ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-03 19:05                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 19:33                                   ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 19:52                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2024-07-03 18:44                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-07-03 19:55                               ` Christian Brauner
2024-07-03 17:11                       ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-04  2:38                       ` Huacai Chen
2024-07-04  3:23                         ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-04  4:14                           ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-04  5:55                       ` Florian Weimer
2024-07-04  6:02                         ` Xi Ruoyao
2024-07-01  4:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] statx NULL path support Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-01  6:46   ` Xi Ruoyao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHk-=wjH3F1jTVfADgo0tAnYStuaUZLvz+1NkmtM-TqiuubWcw@mail.gmail.com' \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox