From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[email protected]>
To: Christian Loehle <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] cpufreq/schedutil: Remove iowait boost
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:07:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gMni0QJTBJXoVOav=kOtQ9W--NyXAgq+dXA+m-bciG8w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:17 PM Christian Loehle
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The previous commit provides a new cpu_util_cfs_boost_io interface for
> schedutil which uses the io boosted utilization of the per-task
> tracking strategy. Schedutil iowait boosting is therefore no longer
> necessary so remove it.
I'm wondering about the cases when schedutil is used without EAS.
Are they still going to be handled as before after this change?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-18 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-04 20:16 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Introduce per-task io utilization boost Christian Loehle
2024-03-04 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Introduce per-task io util boost Christian Loehle
2024-03-25 3:30 ` Qais Yousef
2024-03-04 20:16 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] cpufreq/schedutil: Remove iowait boost Christian Loehle
2024-03-18 14:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2024-03-18 16:40 ` Christian Loehle
2024-03-18 17:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-19 13:58 ` Christian Loehle
2024-03-25 2:37 ` Qais Yousef
2024-04-19 13:42 ` Christian Loehle
2024-04-29 11:18 ` Qais Yousef
2024-05-07 15:19 ` Christian Loehle
2024-05-12 15:29 ` Qais Yousef
2024-03-05 0:20 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Introduce per-task io utilization boost Bart Van Assche
2024-03-05 9:13 ` Christian Loehle
2024-03-05 18:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-03-06 10:49 ` Christian Loehle
2024-03-21 12:39 ` Qais Yousef
2024-03-21 17:57 ` Christian Loehle
2024-03-21 19:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-03-25 12:06 ` Christian Loehle
2024-03-25 17:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-03-25 2:53 ` Qais Yousef
2024-03-22 18:08 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-03-25 2:20 ` Qais Yousef
2024-03-25 17:18 ` Christian Loehle
2024-03-25 12:24 ` Christian Loehle
2024-03-28 10:09 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0gMni0QJTBJXoVOav=kOtQ9W--NyXAgq+dXA+m-bciG8w@mail.gmail.com' \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox