From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ot1-f53.google.com (mail-ot1-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A13954E1D3; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 14:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.53 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710770865; cv=none; b=IKuWOXPRORqmxcKKppSVcw98QgAG58602KMoP8zUEkLRKmsZUT/b1nHaKNTapgnQ2ZLI4qH9gw/s11xlUuQ+8n5BusrfP/D/yURrCZQZJN1bZRjSjm3cVXnYqhkgyTgAyka3nqF5BecVetj8bEIYGtaHxlXMs20CpwI4RmEqZco= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710770865; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Wn1lQcXTqfPvFBpRxXswobUk4JknmyEX40y5OAXc5vU=; h=MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=CFkt+DJzgSTKj7cL6TKbHaroqJzGPkRt0wEuk5Z30WI7aBewETzOtp0iW5sYkoF3XgARW7S3DfheaXwbBX0czIENKtnPAxbDL26EFHqZaJ3+hQMuNYE2ZgMbrxBoTU8c0EDIevxVVTZ57JZ0DHVwCtJ/bayJg1bb1Brc0Er3J8Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.210.53 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ot1-f53.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6e677ec9508so319393a34.1; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:07:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710770862; x=1711375662; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Wn1lQcXTqfPvFBpRxXswobUk4JknmyEX40y5OAXc5vU=; b=c58Wq5mq5YMdnhj5qehoibaL31/oDzXMfx/23/KX/m2iE5igQIgLT8DyF+BU+Nrtc3 Hffpf0LZ+KC36b1YocDVO92RYeuuSHXa2l4MvhoDW1sImgwOw7JdipVntlHFqwahkygC p3A+iW+o7nv7/s7EQltNlQJpJW75jIZlU/1tezi4hBlID6QrEWkGUR6Kk4Rd+AvywY3c 96feTLDG+6T5qmxaDGwyR/bIpSHCNYzRAjiEAGU6rgYdawjESo+TSFmLN/1s2XY3SbJb RV8Hsf8MSjdUTL6qD37gR14Oi7z0r9alsbr2hvtVMNHmwvqDHAqeaTvwzU9cMTrSFLRk OoKw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU3bg087vGurN22jBdZ1VKXs9e+yB0trgcFri54pvZHb0olCgYzfNGgKxM4lmM7ESBHlKgxf3+dlHsvffakO3+CR8cxJwNovFLJJQTi2iIvhIZCdyE4SwTtnuJSL0rLOV5LToGNESSX+09smI3NibcERencNrjzZ3Gskh6h940R X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy/Rh2+AKB+fr7/Vki25pPY6ASsUiz6Zevint7uuibX/Sc3NING oVwVVBKWq+6jbjDvGrEVGP2PfR9CWiCO36hwKQgQ9plzy4UJB9+KKYVtzfQW7uclEWNgAhirx67 uBqgQilaTFTAdjzgY4iY4lj2YjQA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEnt/T+QhS18bU4bTnW0vyP35oKalbVYz3kh6c39m2U5Q/+MmVhAreB9JF1RzGRJu9CQirfKD4Z/lQSCnnsMw0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6871:b28:b0:222:8a9d:d935 with SMTP id fq40-20020a0568710b2800b002228a9dd935mr8792017oab.3.1710770862637; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 07:07:42 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240304201625.100619-1-christian.loehle@arm.com> <20240304201625.100619-3-christian.loehle@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20240304201625.100619-3-christian.loehle@arm.com> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 15:07:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] cpufreq/schedutil: Remove iowait boost To: Christian Loehle Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, rafael@kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, vschneid@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, andres@anarazel.de, asml.silence@gmail.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, io-uring@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 9:17=E2=80=AFPM Christian Loehle wrote: > > The previous commit provides a new cpu_util_cfs_boost_io interface for > schedutil which uses the io boosted utilization of the per-task > tracking strategy. Schedutil iowait boosting is therefore no longer > necessary so remove it. I'm wondering about the cases when schedutil is used without EAS. Are they still going to be handled as before after this change?