From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
To: Xiaobing Li <xiaobing.li@samsung.com>
Cc: asml.silence@gmail.com, axboe@kernel.dk, bschubert@ddn.com,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
miklos@szeredi.hu, joshi.k@samsung.com, kun.dou@samsung.com,
peiwei.li@samsung.com, xue01.he@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] fuse io_uring: support registered buffers
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 11:02:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJnrk1YDkZf1GNNODXemHUV1kOyqXtLtQzODiA=Ujkkc5TpfKg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251023114524.1052805-1-xiaobing.li@samsung.com>
On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 11:17 PM Xiaobing Li <xiaobing.li@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/22/25 22:20, Joanne Koong wrote:
> > This adds support for daemons who preregister buffers to minimize the overhead
> > of pinning/unpinning user pages and translating virtual addresses. Registered
> > buffers pay the cost once during registration then reuse the pre-pinned pages,
> > which helps reduce the per-op overhead.
> >
> > This is on top of commit 211ddde0823f in the iouring tree.
>
> Do you have any test data? How does the benefit compare?
> By the way, how were the changes made to libfuse?
Hi Xiaobing,
I am going to run more rigorous benchmarks on this next week after
making the changes for v2 and will report back what I see. The
libfuse-side changes are in this branch [1].
Thanks,
Joanne
[1] https://github.com/joannekoong/libfuse/tree/registered_buffers
>
> Thanks,
> Xiaobing Li
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-24 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-22 20:20 [PATCH v1 0/2] fuse io_uring: support registered buffers Joanne Koong
2025-10-22 20:20 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] io-uring: add io_uring_cmd_get_buffer_info() Joanne Koong
2025-10-23 3:16 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-10-23 22:20 ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-24 0:00 ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-22 20:20 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] fuse: support io-uring registered buffers Joanne Koong
2025-10-23 3:22 ` Caleb Sander Mateos
2025-10-23 12:39 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-23 13:22 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-23 17:42 ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-23 23:44 ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-22 20:43 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] fuse io_uring: support " Bernd Schubert
2025-10-23 22:27 ` Joanne Koong
2025-10-24 18:12 ` Bernd Schubert
2025-10-24 19:37 ` Joanne Koong
[not found] ` <CGME20251023114956epcas5p33a9384d06985dc5936fd355f1d580fb2@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2025-10-23 11:45 ` Xiaobing Li
2025-10-24 18:02 ` Joanne Koong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJnrk1YDkZf1GNNODXemHUV1kOyqXtLtQzODiA=Ujkkc5TpfKg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bschubert@ddn.com \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
--cc=kun.dou@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=peiwei.li@samsung.com \
--cc=xiaobing.li@samsung.com \
--cc=xue01.he@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox