From: Filipe Manana <[email protected]>
To: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] btrfs: make btrfs_check_nocow_lock nowait compatible
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 11:18:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL3q7H6mJEK=T78DF6o=xYmZht=x0jPVgDw3eVoHOKLyxfvdOA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 1:26 AM Stefan Roesch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
>
> Now all the helpers that btrfs_check_nocow_lock uses handle nowait, add
> a nowait flag to btrfs_check_nocow_lock so it can be used by the write
> path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/file.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> index 536bbc8551fc..06cb25f2d3bd 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> @@ -3482,7 +3482,7 @@ int btrfs_dirty_pages(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page **pages,
> struct extent_state **cached, bool noreserve);
> int btrfs_fdatawrite_range(struct inode *inode, loff_t start, loff_t end);
> int btrfs_check_nocow_lock(struct btrfs_inode *inode, loff_t pos,
> - size_t *write_bytes);
> + size_t *write_bytes, bool nowait);
> void btrfs_check_nocow_unlock(struct btrfs_inode *inode);
>
> /* tree-defrag.c */
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> index 0f257205c63d..cf19d381ead6 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> @@ -1481,7 +1481,7 @@ lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page **pages,
> * NOTE: Callers need to call btrfs_check_nocow_unlock() if we return > 0.
> */
> int btrfs_check_nocow_lock(struct btrfs_inode *inode, loff_t pos,
> - size_t *write_bytes)
> + size_t *write_bytes, bool nowait)
> {
> struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info;
> struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
> @@ -1500,16 +1500,21 @@ int btrfs_check_nocow_lock(struct btrfs_inode *inode, loff_t pos,
> fs_info->sectorsize) - 1;
> num_bytes = lockend - lockstart + 1;
>
> - btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(inode, lockstart, lockend, NULL);
> + if (nowait) {
> + if (!btrfs_try_lock_ordered_range(inode, lockstart, lockend)) {
> + btrfs_drew_write_unlock(&root->snapshot_lock);
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> + } else {
> + btrfs_lock_and_flush_ordered_range(inode, lockstart, lockend, NULL);
> + }
> ret = can_nocow_extent(&inode->vfs_inode, lockstart, &num_bytes,
> - NULL, NULL, NULL, false, false);
> - if (ret <= 0) {
> - ret = 0;
> + NULL, NULL, NULL, nowait, false);
> + if (ret <= 0)
> btrfs_drew_write_unlock(&root->snapshot_lock);
> - } else {
> + else
> *write_bytes = min_t(size_t, *write_bytes ,
> num_bytes - pos + lockstart);
> - }
> unlock_extent(&inode->io_tree, lockstart, lockend);
>
> return ret;
> @@ -1666,16 +1671,22 @@ static noinline ssize_t btrfs_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb,
> &data_reserved, pos,
> write_bytes, false);
> if (ret < 0) {
> + int tmp;
> +
> /*
> * If we don't have to COW at the offset, reserve
> * metadata only. write_bytes may get smaller than
> * requested here.
> */
> - if (btrfs_check_nocow_lock(BTRFS_I(inode), pos,
> - &write_bytes) > 0)
> - only_release_metadata = true;
> - else
> + tmp = btrfs_check_nocow_lock(BTRFS_I(inode), pos,
> + &write_bytes, false);
> + if (tmp < 0)
> + ret = tmp;
> + if (tmp > 0)
> + ret = 0;
> + if (ret)
A variable named tmp is not a great name, something like "can_nocow'
would be a lot more clear.
Thanks.
> break;
> + only_release_metadata = true;
> }
>
> num_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(write_bytes + offset, PAGE_SIZE);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 36e755f73764..5426d4f4ac23 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -4884,7 +4884,7 @@ int btrfs_truncate_block(struct btrfs_inode *inode, loff_t from, loff_t len,
> ret = btrfs_check_data_free_space(inode, &data_reserved, block_start,
> blocksize, false);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - if (btrfs_check_nocow_lock(inode, block_start, &write_bytes) > 0) {
> + if (btrfs_check_nocow_lock(inode, block_start, &write_bytes, false) > 0) {
> /* For nocow case, no need to reserve data space */
> only_release_metadata = true;
> } else {
> --
> 2.30.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-08 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-08 0:26 [PATCH v2 00/12] io-uring/btrfs: support async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] mm: export balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_flags() Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:18 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] btrfs: implement a nowait option for tree searches Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 13:19 ` Josef Bacik
2022-09-08 18:05 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] btrfs: make can_nocow_extent nowait compatible Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] btrfs: add the ability to use NO_FLUSH for data reservations Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] btrfs: add btrfs_try_lock_ordered_range Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:18 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 18:12 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] btrfs: make btrfs_check_nocow_lock nowait compatible Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:18 ` Filipe Manana [this message]
2022-09-08 18:23 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] btrfs: make prepare_pages " Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:17 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 18:33 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] btrfs: make lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need " Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:17 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 18:38 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] btrfs: btrfs: plumb NOWAIT through the write path Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:16 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 18:44 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] btrfs: make balance_dirty_pages nowait compatible Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:16 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 18:48 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] btrfs: add assert to search functions Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:15 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 19:10 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 0:26 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] btrfs: enable nowait async buffered writes Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:14 ` Filipe Manana
2022-09-08 19:14 ` Stefan Roesch
2022-09-08 10:14 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] io-uring/btrfs: support " Filipe Manana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAL3q7H6mJEK=T78DF6o=xYmZht=x0jPVgDw3eVoHOKLyxfvdOA@mail.gmail.com' \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox