public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
To: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>,
	Andrew Morton <[email protected]>,
	Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>,
	David Howells <[email protected]>,
	linux-arm-kernel <[email protected]>,
	X86 ML <[email protected]>, LKML <[email protected]>,
	"open list:MIPS" <[email protected]>,
	Parisc List <[email protected]>,
	linuxppc-dev <[email protected]>,
	linux-s390 <[email protected]>,
	sparclinux <[email protected]>,
	linux-block <[email protected]>,
	Linux SCSI List <[email protected]>,
	Linux FS Devel <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected],
	linux-arch <[email protected]>,
	Linux-MM <[email protected]>,
	Network Development <[email protected]>,
	[email protected],
	LSM List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] kernel: add a PF_FORCE_COMPAT flag
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 17:14:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALCETrViwOdFia_aX4p4riE8aqop1zoOqVfiQtSAZEzheC+Ozg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 4:24 PM Al Viro <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 03:53:40PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> > > It would not be a win - most of the syscalls don't give a damn
> > > about 32bit vs. 64bit...
> >
> > Any reasonable implementation would optimize it out for syscalls that don’t care.  Or it could be explicit:
> >
> > DEFINE_MULTIARCH_SYSCALL(...)
>
> 1) what would that look like?

In effect, it would work like this:

/* Arch-specific, but there's a generic case for sane architectures. */
enum syscall_arch {
  SYSCALL_NATIVE,
  SYSCALL_COMPAT,
  SYSCALL_X32,
};

DEFINE_MULTIARCH_SYSCALLn(args, arch)
{
  args are the args here, and arch is the arch.
}

> 2) have you counted the syscalls that do and do not need that?

No.

> 3) how many of those realistically *can* be unified with their
> compat counterparts?  [hint: ioctl(2) cannot]

There would be no requirement to unify anything.  The idea is that
we'd get rid of all the global state flags.

For ioctl, we'd have a new file_operation:

long ioctl(struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long, enum syscall_arch);

I'm not saying this is easy, but I think it's possible and the result
would be more obviously correct than what we have now.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-20  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18 12:45 let import_iovec deal with compat_iovecs as well Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 12:45 ` [PATCH 1/9] kernel: add a PF_FORCE_COMPAT flag Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 13:40   ` Al Viro
2020-09-18 13:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 13:58       ` Al Viro
2020-09-18 15:16         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-19 16:21           ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-19 21:16             ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-19 21:52               ` Finn Thain
2020-09-19 22:22               ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-21 16:10                 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-09-21 16:13                   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-09-21 23:51                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-22  0:22                       ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-09-22  0:58                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-22  6:30                           ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-09-22  7:23                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-22  7:57                               ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-09-22  9:01                                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-22 16:20                                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-23  8:01                                   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-09-23 13:22                                     ` Al Viro
2020-09-19 22:09           ` Al Viro
2020-09-19 22:23             ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-19 22:41               ` Al Viro
2020-09-19 22:53                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-19 23:24                   ` Al Viro
2020-09-20  0:14                     ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2020-09-20  2:57                       ` Al Viro
2020-09-20 16:59                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-20 18:12                           ` Al Viro
2020-09-20 13:55             ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-20 15:02               ` Al Viro
2020-09-19 14:53         ` David Laight
2020-09-18 13:59       ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-20 15:15   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-20 15:55     ` William Kucharski
2020-09-21 16:20       ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-09-20 16:00     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-20 18:07     ` Al Viro
2020-09-20 18:41       ` Al Viro
2020-09-20 19:01       ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-20 19:10         ` Al Viro
2020-09-20 19:22           ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-20 19:28             ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-20 20:49               ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-20 21:13                 ` David Laight
2020-09-21 16:31                   ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-09-20 21:42             ` Al Viro
2020-09-21 16:26             ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-09-20 19:14       ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-09-21  4:28         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 12:45 ` [PATCH 2/9] compat.h: fix a spelling error in <linux/compat.h> Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 13:37   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-09-18 12:45 ` [PATCH 3/9] fs: explicitly check for CHECK_IOVEC_ONLY in rw_copy_check_uvector Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 12:56   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-09-18 13:39   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-09-18 12:45 ` [PATCH 4/9] fs: handle the compat case in import_iovec Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 12:45 ` [PATCH 5/9] fs: remove various compat readv/writev helpers Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 12:45 ` [PATCH 6/9] fs: remove the compat readv/writev syscalls Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 12:45 ` [PATCH 7/9] fs: remove compat_sys_vmsplice Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 12:45 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm: remove compat_process_vm_{readv,writev} Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-18 13:48   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-09-18 12:45 ` [PATCH 9/9] security/keys: remove compat_keyctl_instantiate_key_iov Christoph Hellwig
2020-09-19 14:24 ` let import_iovec deal with compat_iovecs as well David Laight
2020-09-21  4:41   ` 'Christoph Hellwig'
2020-09-21 11:11     ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALCETrViwOdFia_aX4p4riE8aqop1zoOqVfiQtSAZEzheC+Ozg@mail.gmail.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox