From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0795C4338F for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A92603E7 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238980AbhHMJcv (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2021 05:32:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53542 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238954AbhHMJcv (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Aug 2021 05:32:51 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E97EC061756; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2e.google.com with SMTP id w17so17599923ybl.11; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:32:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JpXtCZVKe4NN46MML6gjrpGLey5QNDfpVKJlaCdGXJw=; b=lkKIIH57IpdePfP89WdB5vQLc3fbc2axDpXXA5sLH45KfF9LYzB9fIFPbDu/LJ9W8M VPfP+niLiHw/PWsjBlXAaLHpK+6lGnyfU4FOg8C3kZU0+N4obSsinlJzH+vvA5ZQkbJV JOdyspvuP/YDnkYtvwbkUkVlAXzMsMhsiQPwU3DDoLod0QDYuwpBH+w4YoIN/aGR++Nj aJXrtEVsy8hIW7AbMSETdcNhCi9gwZ854rBMQBe9Z6E0XiZCHw50ABkgzaBnBMYpQnzt 7NVOmDN5R223YR8gUOiHRRduJUicpe/r7paXjAQFyzuVCZMymKDwhttWh0xMiCM2hMi5 0fMQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JpXtCZVKe4NN46MML6gjrpGLey5QNDfpVKJlaCdGXJw=; b=JwQmu98WktUdsZJ0O7joj0/3kdXziJHteeFPvmxqNx68YJmYZ+pbrhUcJof8RqLosk HtwjEYUi0I1FRY8jMd1JKEavhWlkKrsjgswWrMMhl/5kqHErGDJoJffnsR5sQxORN33l BEbiEiNP+WIZszoaOrIBtyVFVAHsJ0DSrCEa/W6krA4ZmtV+IrVVdQRy3P6nduM93TgR u2i9K23MxbE9cN8RXKqRLBbb9Xtq60SVJWShnUWk0fvgUOLKJM1gCFmpkqT8r6F0DFEa 85zn68eG/vKxUf9+Y+4emo9CPkL9FX1RnVOGrP0NYeIrctWMRY9Faa7YBQBq4iv+ltmX Pe/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530jlCpeKNZ9xiifuh1Qoq+EuMTb5yFw1WlLR3wawU02QZVmxWKi MFPBlDVK536O4I1L430I6OOHm9d9IvamCus7vO4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwGPon6+zv48FPVKNyTaDfkGv5T3cSOEdkbqF5efnr5qE9DwxyOplhObQFgjipL1k4AehU/o1zqDJcsAFZj+EY= X-Received: by 2002:a25:c6d6:: with SMTP id k205mr1700192ybf.168.1628847143896; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 02:32:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210708063447.3556403-1-dkadashev@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Dmitry Kadashev Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 16:32:12 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] io_uring: add mkdir and [sym]linkat support To: Jens Axboe Cc: Linus Torvalds , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Pavel Begunkov , linux-fsdevel , io-uring Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 2:25 AM Jens Axboe wrote: > > On 7/8/21 12:34 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 11:35 PM Dmitry Kadashev wrote: > >> > >> v9: > >> - reorder commits to keep io_uring ones nicely grouped at the end > >> - change 'fs:' to 'namei:' in related commit subjects, since this is > >> what seems to be usually used in such cases > > > > Ok, ack from me on this series, and as far as I'm concerned it can go > > through the io_uring branch. > > I'll queue it up in a separate branch. I'm assuming we're talking 5.15 > at this point. Is this going to be merged into 5.15? I'm still working on the follow-up patch (well, right at this moment I'm actually on vacation, but will be working on it when I'm back), but hopefully it does not have to be merged in the same merge window / version? Especially given the fact that Al prefers it to be a bigger refactoring of the ESTALE retries rather than just moving bits and pieces to helper functions to simplify the flow, see here: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/20210715103600.3570667-1-dkadashev@gmail.com/ -- Dmitry Kadashev