From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AABAC07E96 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 06:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507B361CE7 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 06:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229673AbhGHGIV (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2021 02:08:21 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49744 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229608AbhGHGIU (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jul 2021 02:08:20 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb31.google.com (mail-yb1-xb31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b31]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CA66C061574; Wed, 7 Jul 2021 23:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb31.google.com with SMTP id a16so7127909ybt.8; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 23:05:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Mlf3iRZ72+39U7Ow36yxaKTO/ydFaCcKjJcQ3DPlKVk=; b=vFKGV7DaP1rn8takaF5L5Rb7WjGO3ASU2IE4auSfbeGJb8nJdqqyvFSnUE4bu7gZR2 8LIxZWUPjGYjShNXMKJWjuYRQyJNKnRshiK8HAj6oirvVor8QooyCR50GtqDPqqLbITl m4hmXRLTWa8NVUY2coAmo+4FMvBCH926dzHuKw4WDDKNcfAqBhBRC1F9dXMx2q0rpAl1 IiHFpSmZs0WVniZ4RFmkuGqCDMhj0PKxfVYDDCCu30L+rDr6VyuvxL4X0V7xiEZfXSaJ QSCCpS7jJtB5nUGJ+zpjwu2K1jAORPqWkMuiveZSOm2oqp29Ikh74vUiTCRTPmfAbq++ Z5OA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Mlf3iRZ72+39U7Ow36yxaKTO/ydFaCcKjJcQ3DPlKVk=; b=VpHLeD5ZsrrV/W8OWPdek1Z0ZjqoQh6mDKDWtOczAOIdsFr+bKT/0nEUUz+OI73Her RlIuc5mzLb0MzJ6VH6NOnR5h1uTF0spQDHS2WxPZn9uslZ0c8BYJjFw+XHrA12JxDBUm +McX13qMMBtsfDmtubORHIzonT0U4/j1B+dAMSrMUJGZErobtv+o7THK+xPYdG/UAvhV bc4aicVsFGFcCIMdSM/t0+ogDLlG77VzCiRKEp/0/lT1qJcQJFOsaFYQjBRheCW769ze XrxE6JJKsKmQcjm9aF25YZNiVPWYqvAjCJhVlwkENqBwc4UeEQFhn1fpQb+iWv/3xNai PwCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FpHmel+cn4+lvYZ5F4h8s+p3ECrSm+ToH0NJupfBnaqkFvUkZ xwm8FxQF89c/Rk/4zVCVknm2TiHk5zizLoLmYhQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwgtkiiiuPsB83bKudZvXtPVUeGCFUISRz4Gr7kmPks5hAvgDmUN5yZGB3se1SvXJEW2HwPA0YYX39/tdX40nc= X-Received: by 2002:a25:9bc4:: with SMTP id w4mr34461308ybo.168.1625724337630; Wed, 07 Jul 2021 23:05:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210707122747.3292388-1-dkadashev@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Dmitry Kadashev Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 13:05:26 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] io_uring: add mkdir and [sym]linkat support To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jens Axboe , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Pavel Begunkov , linux-fsdevel , io-uring Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 2:26 AM Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 5:28 AM Dmitry Kadashev wrote: > > > > This started out as an attempt to add mkdirat support to io_uring which > > is heavily based on renameat() / unlinkat() support. > > Ok, sorry for having made you go through all the different versions, > but I like the new series and think it's a marked improvement. No worries at all! > I did send out a few comments to the individual patches that I think > it can all now be made to be even more legible by avoiding some of the > goto spaghetti, but I think that would be a series on top. > > (And I'd like to note again that I based all that on just reading the > patches, so there may be something there that makes it not work well). I'm happy to do that. I suppose it will have to go through Al's tree rather than Jens' one? > One final request: can you keep the fs/namei.c patches as one entirely > separate series, and then do the io_uring parts at the end, rather > than intermixing them? Sure. I'm a bit confused if you mean splitting the series into two or just moving io_uring bits to the end though. I'll send a v9 with io_uring bits moved to the end of the series and if you prefer it to be a completely separate series then let me know. Thank you for the help again, Linus! -- Dmitry Kadashev