From: Dmitry Kadashev <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: io_uring's openat doesn't work with large (2G+) files
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 22:30:13 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOKbgA7Pf2K5o_CkAs2ShcNbV8dx75xZBfM8D1xZcLm5RjmLXA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:19 PM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 4/8/20 7:51 AM, Dmitry Kadashev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > io_uring's openat seems to produce FDs that are incompatible with
> > large files (>2GB). If a file (smaller than 2GB) is opened using
> > io_uring's openat then writes -- both using io_uring and just sync
> > pwrite() -- past that threshold fail with EFBIG. If such a file is
> > opened with sync openat, then both io_uring's writes and sync writes
> > succeed. And if the file is larger than 2GB then io_uring's openat
> > fails right away, while the sync one works.
> >
> > Kernel versions: 5.6.0-rc2, 5.6.0.
> >
> > A couple of reproducers attached, one demos successful open with
> > failed writes afterwards, and another failing open (in comparison with
> > sync calls).
> >
> > The output of the former one for example:
> >
> > *** sync openat
> > openat succeeded
> > sync write at offset 0
> > write succeeded
> > sync write at offset 4294967296
> > write succeeded
> >
> > *** sync openat
> > openat succeeded
> > io_uring write at offset 0
> > write succeeded
> > io_uring write at offset 4294967296
> > write succeeded
> >
> > *** io_uring openat
> > openat succeeded
> > sync write at offset 0
> > write succeeded
> > sync write at offset 4294967296
> > write failed: File too large
> >
> > *** io_uring openat
> > openat succeeded
> > io_uring write at offset 0
> > write succeeded
> > io_uring write at offset 4294967296
> > write failed: File too large
>
> Can you try with this one? Seems like only openat2 gets it set,
> not openat...
I've tried specifying O_LARGEFILE explicitly, that did not change the
behavior. Is this good enough? Much faster for me to check this way
that rebuilding the kernel. But if necessary I can do that.
Also, forgot to mention, this is on x86_64, not sure if O_LARGEFILE is
necessary to do 2G+ files there?
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index 79bd22289d73..63eb7efe10f2 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -2957,6 +2957,8 @@ static int io_openat_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
> req->open.how.mode = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
> fname = u64_to_user_ptr(READ_ONCE(sqe->addr));
> req->open.how.flags = READ_ONCE(sqe->open_flags);
> + if (force_o_largefile())
> + req->open.how.flags |= O_LARGEFILE;
>
> req->open.filename = getname(fname);
> if (IS_ERR(req->open.filename)) {
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
--
Dmitry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-08 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-08 14:51 io_uring's openat doesn't work with large (2G+) files Dmitry Kadashev
2020-04-08 15:19 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-08 15:30 ` Dmitry Kadashev [this message]
2020-04-08 15:36 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-08 15:41 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2020-04-08 15:49 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-08 16:12 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2020-04-08 16:26 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-09 3:50 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2020-04-09 15:29 ` Jens Axboe
2020-04-13 9:20 ` Dmitry Kadashev
2020-04-13 10:09 ` Pavel Begunkov
2020-04-13 10:19 ` Dmitry Kadashev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOKbgA7Pf2K5o_CkAs2ShcNbV8dx75xZBfM8D1xZcLm5RjmLXA@mail.gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox