Re: [PATCH 10/10] xfs: add support for non-blocking fh_to_dentry()

[Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 5:10 PM Thomas Bertschinger
<tahbertschinger@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu Sep 11, 2025 at 6:39 AM MDT, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 2:29 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 03:49:27PM -0600, Thomas Bertschinger wrote:
> >> > This is to support using open_by_handle_at(2) via io_uring. It is useful
> >> > for io_uring to request that opening a file via handle be completed
> >> > using only cached data, or fail with -EAGAIN if that is not possible.
> >> >
> >> > The signature of xfs_nfs_get_inode() is extended with a new flags
> >> > argument that allows callers to specify XFS_IGET_INCORE.
> >> >
> >> > That flag is set when the VFS passes the FILEID_CACHED flag via the
> >> > fileid_type argument.
> >>
> >> Please post the entire series to all list.  No one has any idea what your
> >> magic new flag does without seeing all the patches.
> >>
> >
> > Might as well re-post your entire v2 patches with v2 subjects and
> > cc xfs list.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amir.
>
>
> Thanks for the advice, sorry for messing up the procedure...
>
> Since there are a few quick fixups I can make, I may go straight to
> sending v3 with the correct subject and cc. Any reason for me to not do
> that -- is it preferable to resend v2 right away with no changes?

No worries. v3 is fine.
But maybe give it a day or two for other people to comment on v2
before posting v3. Some people may even be mid review of v2
and that can be a bit annoying to get v3 while in the middle of review of v2.

Thanks,
Amir.