From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BABBB34F47E; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 15:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757430861; cv=none; b=jxbfgHviK+Rm2mGkdueqLI9GiaD5ETDrAIWyGc8iVsMZEOYG+T4PqBoXpOOu6FmxkbRlVIA/Q+FXSyH7Zq1qakR7+ZegidKEz+8VKfhFvFk8glt5efGya6bhxFOxRCUaf24FMTRwzIskckLEfP2Do5+oh3VnznzWQCZYDN8pO/s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757430861; c=relaxed/simple; bh=q0CAo9AaS+g1TeiWkOjsPGE8x7Tgir3wLwXBVLvxzbI=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject: References:In-Reply-To; b=teNiZ1jgWnQxlPZCpoLGqSIKeZIihuKE5uwf6z5Q6/va12xf3Ecm06yJ56qoyG6IZ7CRVnFE/7pDQcWRGQgf19TO74tbtgUYYGY7CwhuZ/ntnvAO9dAnKgbcrVjv+dOErM3wLOUlNHzl5jLjIf0Qg0UXxMaQSHPJJhHyyjghNCM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=a6LQysXA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="a6LQysXA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4012FC4CEF4; Tue, 9 Sep 2025 15:14:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757430861; bh=q0CAo9AaS+g1TeiWkOjsPGE8x7Tgir3wLwXBVLvxzbI=; h=Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=a6LQysXATxV4KFZUPFzOzrvrsS+4F4pnFGoizKfvqhRe7XrsLsibYhFc+CynFUN0R 74xndH+WNb0A3NTvHRXH5P/umsPuGipW05Bn6+QpU866QdvdTcmaseOuwtjwGcDSjy j/xc7wcEBG8wOgxlSuMkmxMn/SyCPXFhOHLL8Q0BVatFT1aCVAw5E8m/OlkUvPX1tZ 2vArph/RbOYnwpbt4J6RD3tnTH7kEbzOBSM3IP6WHg91s5fCAnShdrz4dZn9pvIJVJ kbdxzgnnTm5cGLJxS9NN4fQmOjDPNzW+07t9ThRGibX3GF52T3DRUgFd8s5MKg3Kc6 j0R504QwwA6Lg== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2025 17:14:17 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: "Jakub Kicinski" , "Konstantin Ryabitsev" , "Linus Torvalds" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , , "Caleb Sander Mateos" , "Greg Kroah-Hartman" , "io-uring" , To: "Jens Axboe" From: "Danilo Krummrich" Subject: Re: Link trailers revisited (was Re: [GIT PULL] io_uring fix for 6.17-rc5) References: <9ef87524-d15c-4b2c-9f86-00417dad9c48@kernel.dk> <20250905-sparkling-stalwart-galago-8a87e0@lemur> <68bf3854f101b_4224d100d7@dwillia2-mobl4.notmuch> <5922560.DvuYhMxLoT@rafael.j.wysocki> <20250909071818.15507ee6@kernel.org> <92dc8570-84a2-4015-9c7a-6e7da784869a@kernel.dk> In-Reply-To: <92dc8570-84a2-4015-9c7a-6e7da784869a@kernel.dk> On Tue Sep 9, 2025 at 4:35 PM CEST, Jens Axboe wrote: > As far as I can tell, only two things have been established here: > > 1) Linus hates the Link tags, except if they have extra information > 2) Lots of other folks find them useful > > and hence we're at a solid deadlock here. I find them useful too. For instance, I regularly use them when I come acro= ss a patch, e.g. because it introduced a bug, and want to see the full context = of the entire patch series the patch originates from. IIUC, the complaint about those links is mostly about not being distinguish= able from other links that have been added for a more specific reason. I usually refer to additional links from the commit message by referencing = them, such that there is an obvious difference: Link: ${URL} vs. Link: ${URL} [1] However, for links that are automatically added and just point to the same = patch on lore, we could also just use a different tag in the future. What about "Patch:"?