From: Gaurav Jain <[email protected]>
To: Steffen Trumtrar <[email protected]>,
Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
Horia Geanta <[email protected]>,
Pankaj Gupta <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Boris Pismenny <[email protected]>,
John Fastabend <[email protected]>,
Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [BUG] Layerscape CAAM+kTLS+io_uring
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 06:30:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB5342B4B4BC56387BB1193997E7CE9@VI1PR04MB5342.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Hello Steffen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steffen Trumtrar <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 3:36 PM
> To: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Horia Geanta
> <[email protected]>; Pankaj Gupta <[email protected]>; Gaurav Jain
> <[email protected]>; Jens Axboe <[email protected]>; Pavel Begunkov
> <[email protected]>; Boris Pismenny <[email protected]>; John
> Fastabend <[email protected]>; Daniel Borkmann
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [BUG] Layerscape CAAM+kTLS+io_uring
>
> Caution: EXT Email
>
> Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 5 May 2022 21:20:46 +0200 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> no one seems to care about this problem. :/
> >>
> >> Maybe too many components are involved, I'm the respective
> >> maintainers on Cc.
> >>
> >> Cc += the CAAM maintainers
> >> Cc += the io_uring maintainers
> >> Cc += the kTLS maintainers
> >>
> >> On 27.04.2022 10:20:40, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > I have a Layerscape-1046a based board where I'm trying to use a
> >> > combination of liburing (v2.0) with splice, kTLS and CAAM (kernel
> >> > v5.17). The problem I see is that on shutdown the last bytes are
> >> > missing. It looks like io_uring is not waiting for all completions
> >> > from the CAAM driver.
> >> >
> >> > With ARM-ASM instead of the CAAM, the setup works fine.
> >>
> >> What's the difference between the CAAM and ARM-ASM crypto? Without
> >> looking into the code I think the CAAM is asynchron while ARM-ASM is
> >> synchron. Is this worth investigating?
> >
> > Sounds like
> > 20ffc7adf53a ("net/tls: missing received data after fast remote
> > close")
>
> That fixes something in tls_sw. I have a kernel that includes this patch. So this
> sounds right, but can't be it, right?
>
To understand more on problem, can you share how you are offloading ktls to CAAM?
Gaurav
>
> Best regards,
> Steffen
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Dipl.-Inform. Steffen Trumtrar |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21 |
> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.pe
> ngutronix.de%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cgaurav.jain%40nxp.com%7Cc225fa4
> 3da7f4a43f16b08da3723dc4a%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%
> 7C0%7C637882924400875890%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wL
> jAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C
> %7C&sdata=fI1BHNZIT5RlpjEdEMXVkv1WaHcvgTlZOcaC0LRojac%3D&
> reserved=0 |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686| Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-17 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-27 8:20 [BUG] Layerscape CAAM+kTLS+io_uring Steffen Trumtrar
2022-05-05 19:20 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-05-06 0:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-05-16 10:06 ` Steffen Trumtrar
2022-05-17 6:30 ` Gaurav Jain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VI1PR04MB5342B4B4BC56387BB1193997E7CE9@VI1PR04MB5342.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox