[PATCH] io_uring: fix some spelling mistakes in comment

[PATCH] io_uring: fix some spelling mistakes in comment

[Yu Zhe]

Fix typos in comment.

Signed-off-by: Yu Zhe <yuzhe@nfschina.com>
---
 io_uring/io_uring.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 58ac13b69dc8..99074d5fe195 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static void io_eventfd_flush_signal(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 	 * Eventfd should only get triggered when at least one event has been
 	 * posted. Some applications rely on the eventfd notification count
 	 * only changing IFF a new CQE has been added to the CQ ring. There's
-	 * no depedency on 1:1 relationship between how many times this
+	 * no dependency on 1:1 relationship between how many times this
 	 * function is called (and hence the eventfd count) and number of CQEs
 	 * posted to the CQ ring.
 	 */
@@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ static __cold void io_tctx_exit_cb(struct callback_head *cb)
 	 * When @in_idle, we're in cancellation and it's racy to remove the
 	 * node. It'll be removed by the end of cancellation, just ignore it.
 	 * tctx can be NULL if the queueing of this task_work raced with
-	 * work cancelation off the exec path.
+	 * work cancellation off the exec path.
 	 */
 	if (tctx && !atomic_read(&tctx->in_idle))
 		io_uring_del_tctx_node((unsigned long)work->ctx);
@@ -3095,7 +3095,7 @@ __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all, struct io_sq_data *sqd)
 		bool loop = false;
 
 		io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current);
-		/* read completions before cancelations */
+		/* read completions before cancellations */
 		inflight = tctx_inflight(tctx, !cancel_all);
 		if (!inflight)
 			break;
-- 
2.11.0

Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix some spelling mistakes in comment

[Ammar Faizi]

On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:12:42PM +0800, Yu Zhe wrote:
> @@ -2822,7 +2822,7 @@ static __cold void io_tctx_exit_cb(struct callback_head *cb)
>  	 * When @in_idle, we're in cancellation and it's racy to remove the
>  	 * node. It'll be removed by the end of cancellation, just ignore it.
>  	 * tctx can be NULL if the queueing of this task_work raced with
> -	 * work cancelation off the exec path.
> +	 * work cancellation off the exec path.
>  	 */
>  	if (tctx && !atomic_read(&tctx->in_idle))
>  		io_uring_del_tctx_node((unsigned long)work->ctx);
> @@ -3095,7 +3095,7 @@ __cold void io_uring_cancel_generic(bool cancel_all, struct io_sq_data *sqd)
>  		bool loop = false;
>  
>  		io_uring_drop_tctx_refs(current);
> -		/* read completions before cancelations */
> +		/* read completions before cancellations */

"cancelations" is not a typo.

"cancelations" and "cancellations" are both valid spellings. The former
is predominantly used in the US, while the latter is predominantly used
in the UK.

-- 
Ammar Faizi

Re: [PATCH] io_uring: fix some spelling mistakes in comment

[Dan Carpenter]

On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 05:12:42PM +0800, Yu Zhe wrote:
> Fix typos in comment.
> 

The cancelation vs cancellation thing is a British vs American spelling
difference.  (Leave it as-is).

regards,
dan carpenter