public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Moore <[email protected]>,
	Linux-Audit Mailing List <[email protected]>,
	LKML <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], Eric Paris <[email protected]>,
	Steve Grubb <[email protected]>, Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>,
	Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
	Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] two suggested iouring op audit updates
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:07:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On 2023-01-27 16:02, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 1/27/23 3:53 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 5:46 PM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> On 1/27/23 3:38 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 2:43 PM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> On 1/27/23 12:42 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:40 PM Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 1/27/23 10:23 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> >>>>>>> A couple of updates to the iouring ops audit bypass selections suggested in
> >>>>>>> consultation with Steve Grubb.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Richard Guy Briggs (2):
> >>>>>>>   io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not IORING_OP_MADVISE
> >>>>>>>   io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  io_uring/opdef.c | 4 +++-
> >>>>>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Look fine to me - we should probably add stable to both of them, just
> >>>>>> to keep things consistent across releases. I can queue them up for 6.3.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please hold off until I've had a chance to look them over ...
> >>>>
> >>>> I haven't taken anything yet, for things like this I always let it
> >>>> simmer until people have had a chance to do so.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.  FWIW, that sounds very reasonable to me, but I've seen lots
> >>> of different behaviors across subsystems and wanted to make sure we
> >>> were on the same page.
> >>
> >> Sounds fair. BTW, can we stop CC'ing closed lists on patch
> >> submissions? Getting these:
> >>
> >> Your message to Linux-audit awaits moderator approval
> >>
> >> on every reply is really annoying.
> > 
> > We kinda need audit related stuff on the linux-audit list, that's our
> > mailing list for audit stuff.
> 
> Sure, but then it should be open. Or do separate postings or something.
> CC'ing a closed list with open lists and sending email to people that
> are not on that closed list is bad form.

I've made an inquiry.

> Jens Axboe

- RGB

--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Sr. S/W Engineer, Kernel Security, Base Operating Systems
Remote, Ottawa, Red Hat Canada
IRC: rgb, SunRaycer
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-27 23:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-27 17:23 [PATCH v1 0/2] two suggested iouring op audit updates Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 17:23 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not IORING_OP_MADVISE Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 22:35   ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 22:45     ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-27 22:57       ` Paul Moore
2023-01-28 16:48         ` Steve Grubb
2023-01-27 23:02       ` Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 23:03         ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-27 23:08           ` Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 22:55     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 23:05       ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 17:23 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 22:43   ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 23:01     ` Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 23:05       ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-28  0:07         ` Paul Moore
2023-01-28  0:06       ` Paul Moore
2023-01-28  0:19         ` Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-28 17:26     ` Steve Grubb
2023-01-29 23:37       ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 17:40 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] two suggested iouring op audit updates Jens Axboe
2023-01-27 19:42   ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 19:43     ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-27 22:38       ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 22:46         ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-27 22:53           ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 23:02             ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-27 23:07               ` Richard Guy Briggs [this message]
2023-01-27 23:08               ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 23:10                 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-28 16:47             ` Steve Grubb
2023-01-28 17:03               ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox