From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8475AC433B4 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F74E6102A for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229486AbhCaQqv (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:46:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47290 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233891AbhCaQqc (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Mar 2021 12:46:32 -0400 Received: from zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk (zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk [IPv6:2607:5300:60:148a::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CE5CC061574; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 09:46:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viro by zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lRdz9-001Pmf-Qf; Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:46:27 +0000 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 16:46:27 +0000 From: Al Viro To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Dmitry Kadashev , Jens Axboe , io-uring , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: make do_mkdirat() take struct filename Message-ID: References: <20201116044529.1028783-1-dkadashev@gmail.com> <20201116044529.1028783-2-dkadashev@gmail.com> <027e8488-2654-12cd-d525-37f249954b4d@kernel.dk> <20210126225504.GM740243@zeniv-ca> <20210201150042.GQ740243@zeniv-ca> <20210201152947.GR740243@zeniv-ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: Al Viro Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:28:04AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Al Viro writes: > > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 03:00:42PM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > > > >> The last one is the easiest to answer - we want to keep the imported strings > >> around for audit. It's not so much a proper refcounting as it is "we might > >> want freeing delayed" implemented as refcount. > > > > BTW, regarding io_uring + audit interactions - just how is that supposed to > > work if you offload any work that might lead to audit records (on permission > > checks, etc.) to helper threads? > > For people looking into these details. Things have gotten much better > recently. > > The big change is that io_uring helper threads are now proper > threads of the process that is using io_uring. The io_uring helper > threads just happen to never execute any userspace code. audit context is per-thread (as it has to be, obviously - multiple threads can have overlapping syscalls), so getname()/putname() interplay with that is still not obvious. I agree that these threads have gotten better, though.