public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
To: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	syzbot <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING in mntput_no_expire (2)
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 01:38:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YGu7n+dhMep1741/@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210405200737.qurhkqitoxweousx@wittgenstein>

On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 10:07:37PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:

> > diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> > index 216f16e74351..82344f1139ff 100644
> > --- a/fs/namei.c
> > +++ b/fs/namei.c
> > @@ -2289,6 +2289,9 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
> >  	int error;
> >  	const char *s = nd->name->name;
> >  
> > +	nd->path.mnt = NULL;
> > +	nd->path.dentry = NULL;
> > +
> >  	/* LOOKUP_CACHED requires RCU, ask caller to retry */
> >  	if ((flags & (LOOKUP_RCU | LOOKUP_CACHED)) == LOOKUP_CACHED)
> >  		return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
> > @@ -2322,8 +2325,6 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	nd->root.mnt = NULL;
> > -	nd->path.mnt = NULL;
> > -	nd->path.dentry = NULL;
> >  
> >  	/* Absolute pathname -- fetch the root (LOOKUP_IN_ROOT uses nd->dfd). */
> >  	if (*s == '/' && !(flags & LOOKUP_IN_ROOT)) {
> 
> Bingo. That fixes it.

*grumble*

OK, I suppose it'll do for backports, but longer term... I don't like how
convoluted the rules for nameidata fields' validity are.  In particular,
for nd->path I would rather have it
	* cleared in set_nameidata()
	* cleared when it become invalid.  That would be
		* places that drop rcu_read_lock() without having legitimized the sucker
		  (already done, except for terminate_walk())
		* terminate_walk() in non-RCU case after path_put(&nd->path)

OTOH... wait a sec - the whole thing is this cycle regression, so...

Could you verify that the variant below fixes that crap?

Make sure nd->path.mnt and nd->path.dentry are always valid pointers

Initialize them in set_nameidata() and make sure that terminate_walk() clears them
once the pointers become potentially invalid (i.e. we leave RCU mode or drop them
in non-RCU one).  Currently we have "path_init() always initializes them and nobody
accesses them outside of path_init()/terminate_walk() segments", which is asking
for trouble.

With that change we would have nd->path.{mnt,dentry}
	1) always valid - NULL or pointing to currently allocated objects.
	2) non-NULL while we are successfully walking
	3) NULL when we are not walking at all
	4) contributing to refcounts whenever non-NULL outside of RCU mode.

Hopefully-fixes: 6c6ec2b0a3e0 ("fs: add support for LOOKUP_CACHED")
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 216f16e74351..fc8760d4314e 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -579,6 +579,8 @@ static void set_nameidata(struct nameidata *p, int dfd, struct filename *name)
 	p->stack = p->internal;
 	p->dfd = dfd;
 	p->name = name;
+	p->path.mnt = NULL;
+	p->path.dentry = NULL;
 	p->total_link_count = old ? old->total_link_count : 0;
 	p->saved = old;
 	current->nameidata = p;
@@ -652,6 +654,8 @@ static void terminate_walk(struct nameidata *nd)
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
 	nd->depth = 0;
+	nd->path.mnt = NULL;
+	nd->path.dentry = NULL;
 }
 
 /* path_put is needed afterwards regardless of success or failure */
@@ -2322,8 +2326,6 @@ static const char *path_init(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags)
 	}
 
 	nd->root.mnt = NULL;
-	nd->path.mnt = NULL;
-	nd->path.dentry = NULL;
 
 	/* Absolute pathname -- fetch the root (LOOKUP_IN_ROOT uses nd->dfd). */
 	if (*s == '/' && !(flags & LOOKUP_IN_ROOT)) {

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-06  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <[email protected]>
2021-04-01 15:45 ` [syzbot] WARNING in mntput_no_expire (2) Christian Brauner
2021-04-01 16:09   ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-01 17:46     ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-01 17:59       ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-01 19:11         ` Al Viro
2021-04-04  2:34           ` Al Viro
2021-04-04  2:38             ` Al Viro
2021-04-04 11:34             ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-04 15:56               ` Al Viro
2021-04-04 16:40                 ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-04 16:44                   ` Al Viro
2021-04-04 17:05                     ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-04 18:50                       ` Al Viro
2021-04-04 20:17                         ` Al Viro
2021-04-05 11:44                           ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-05 16:18                             ` Al Viro
2021-04-05 17:08                               ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-05 18:23                                 ` Al Viro
2021-04-05 18:28                                   ` Al Viro
2021-04-05 20:07                                     ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-06  1:38                                       ` Al Viro [this message]
2021-04-06  2:24                                         ` Al Viro
2021-04-06 12:35                                         ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-06 13:13                                           ` Al Viro
2021-04-06 13:22                                             ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-06 14:15                                               ` Al Viro
2021-04-06 14:23                                                 ` Al Viro
2021-04-06 15:37                                                   ` Jens Axboe
2021-04-06 14:46                                                 ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-04 16:52                   ` Christian Brauner
2021-04-04 16:55                     ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YGu7n+dhMep1741/@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox