Re: [RFC 4/4] io_uring: implement futex wait

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 12:31:48PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 6/5/21 1:43 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Andres,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 03 2021 at 12:03, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> On 2021-06-01 23:53:00 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>> You surely made your point that this is well thought out.
> >>
> >> Really impressed with your effort to generously interpret the first
> >> version of a proof of concept patch that explicitly was aimed at getting
> >> feedback on the basic design and the different use cases.
> > 
> > feedback on what?
> > 
> > There is absolutely no description of design and obviously there is no
> > use case either. So what do you expect me to be generous about?
> 
> That's a complete fallacy, the very RFC is about clarifying a
> use case that I was hinted about, not mentioning those I described
> you in a reply. Obviously

Then consider this:

Nacked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

for anything touching futex.c, until such time that you can provide a
coherent description of what and why you're doing things.