From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/5] io_uring: add fsetxattr and setxattr support
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 22:24:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Thu, Dec 30, 2021 at 11:09:12AM -0800, Jens Axboe wrote:
> For each command, there are two steps:
>
> - The prep of it, this happens inline from the system call where the
> request, or requests, are submitted. The prep phase should ensure that
> argument structs are stable. Hence a caller can prep a request and
> have memory on stack, as long as it submits before it becomes invalid.
> An example of that are iovecs for readv/writev. The caller does not
> need to have them stable for the duration of the request, just across
> submit. That's the io_${cmd}_prep() helpers.
>
> - The execution of it. May be separate from prep and from an async
> worker. Where the lower layers don't support a nonblocking attempt,
> they are always done async. The statx stuff is an example of that.
>
> Hence prep needs to copy from userland on the prep side always for the
> statx family, as execution will happen out-of-line from the submission.
>
> Does that explain it?
The actual call chain leading to filename_lookup() is, AFAICS, this:
io_statx()
do_statx()
vfs_statx()
user_path_at()
user_path_at_empty()
filename_lookup()
If you are providing such warranties for the contents of pathname
arguments, you have a bug in statx in the mainline. If you are not,
there's no point in doing getname() in getxattr prep.
Which one it is?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-30 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-29 20:29 [PATCH v10 0/5] io_uring: add xattr support Stefan Roesch
2021-12-29 20:29 ` [PATCH v10 1/5] fs: split off do_user_path_at_empty from user_path_at_empty() Stefan Roesch
2021-12-30 0:49 ` Al Viro
2021-12-30 19:57 ` Stefan Roesch
2021-12-29 20:29 ` [PATCH v10 2/5] fs: split off setxattr_copy and do_setxattr function from setxattr Stefan Roesch
2021-12-30 1:15 ` Al Viro
2021-12-30 9:41 ` Christian Brauner
2021-12-30 19:57 ` Stefan Roesch
2021-12-29 20:30 ` [PATCH v10 3/5] fs: split off do_getxattr from getxattr Stefan Roesch
2021-12-29 20:30 ` [PATCH v10 4/5] io_uring: add fsetxattr and setxattr support Stefan Roesch
2021-12-30 1:58 ` Al Viro
2021-12-30 2:17 ` Al Viro
2021-12-30 2:19 ` Al Viro
2021-12-30 3:04 ` Al Viro
2021-12-30 10:12 ` Christian Brauner
2021-12-30 16:16 ` Al Viro
2021-12-30 18:01 ` Christian Brauner
2021-12-30 19:09 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-30 22:24 ` Al Viro [this message]
2021-12-30 22:46 ` Jens Axboe
2021-12-30 23:02 ` Al Viro
2021-12-30 20:18 ` Stefan Roesch
2021-12-29 20:30 ` [PATCH v10 5/5] io_uring: add fgetxattr and getxattr support Stefan Roesch
2021-12-30 1:41 ` Al Viro
2021-12-30 1:46 ` Al Viro
2021-12-30 20:01 ` Stefan Roesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox