public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
To: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] block: wire-up support for passthrough plugging
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 13:25:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnyaRB+u1x6nIVp1@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Hello,

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 11:17:46AM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> 
> Add support for plugging in passthrough path. When plugging is enabled, the
> requests are added to a plug instead of getting dispatched to the driver.
> And when the plug is finished, the whole batch gets dispatched via
> ->queue_rqs which turns out to be more efficient. Otherwise dispatching
> used to happen via ->queue_rq, one request at a time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 84d749511f55..2cf011b57cf9 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -2340,6 +2340,40 @@ void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
>  	blk_mq_hctx_mark_pending(hctx, ctx);
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Allow 2x BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT requests on plug queue for multiple
> + * queues. This is important for md arrays to benefit from merging
> + * requests.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned short blk_plug_max_rq_count(struct blk_plug *plug)
> +{
> +	if (plug->multiple_queues)
> +		return BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT * 2;
> +	return BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT;
> +}
> +
> +static void blk_add_rq_to_plug(struct blk_plug *plug, struct request *rq)
> +{
> +	struct request *last = rq_list_peek(&plug->mq_list);
> +
> +	if (!plug->rq_count) {
> +		trace_block_plug(rq->q);
> +	} else if (plug->rq_count >= blk_plug_max_rq_count(plug) ||
> +		   (!blk_queue_nomerges(rq->q) &&
> +		    blk_rq_bytes(last) >= BLK_PLUG_FLUSH_SIZE)) {
> +		blk_mq_flush_plug_list(plug, false);
> +		trace_block_plug(rq->q);
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!plug->multiple_queues && last && last->q != rq->q)
> +		plug->multiple_queues = true;
> +	if (!plug->has_elevator && (rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELV))
> +		plug->has_elevator = true;
> +	rq->rq_next = NULL;
> +	rq_list_add(&plug->mq_list, rq);
> +	plug->rq_count++;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * blk_mq_request_bypass_insert - Insert a request at dispatch list.
>   * @rq: Pointer to request to be inserted.
> @@ -2353,7 +2387,12 @@ void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
>  				  bool run_queue)
>  {
>  	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
> +	struct blk_plug *plug = current->plug;
>  
> +	if (plug) {
> +		blk_add_rq_to_plug(plug, rq);
> +		return;
> +	}

This way may cause nested plugging, and breaks xfstests generic/131.
Also may cause io hang since request can't be polled before flushing
plug in blk_execute_rq().

I'd suggest to apply the plug in blk_execute_rq_nowait(), such as:


diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 2cf011b57cf9..60c29c0229d5 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1169,6 +1169,62 @@ static void blk_end_sync_rq(struct request *rq, blk_status_t error)
 	complete(waiting);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Allow 2x BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT requests on plug queue for multiple
+ * queues. This is important for md arrays to benefit from merging
+ * requests.
+ */
+static inline unsigned short blk_plug_max_rq_count(struct blk_plug *plug)
+{
+	if (plug->multiple_queues)
+		return BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT * 2;
+	return BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT;
+}
+
+static void blk_add_rq_to_plug(struct blk_plug *plug, struct request *rq)
+{
+	struct request *last = rq_list_peek(&plug->mq_list);
+
+	if (!plug->rq_count) {
+		trace_block_plug(rq->q);
+	} else if (plug->rq_count >= blk_plug_max_rq_count(plug) ||
+		   (!blk_queue_nomerges(rq->q) &&
+		    blk_rq_bytes(last) >= BLK_PLUG_FLUSH_SIZE)) {
+		blk_mq_flush_plug_list(plug, false);
+		trace_block_plug(rq->q);
+	}
+
+	if (!plug->multiple_queues && last && last->q != rq->q)
+		plug->multiple_queues = true;
+	if (!plug->has_elevator && (rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELV))
+		plug->has_elevator = true;
+	rq->rq_next = NULL;
+	rq_list_add(&plug->mq_list, rq);
+	plug->rq_count++;
+}
+
+static void __blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
+		rq_end_io_fn *done, bool use_plug)
+{
+	WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
+	WARN_ON(!blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq));
+
+	rq->end_io = done;
+
+	blk_account_io_start(rq);
+
+	if (use_plug && current->plug) {
+		blk_add_rq_to_plug(current->plug, rq);
+		return;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * don't check dying flag for MQ because the request won't
+	 * be reused after dying flag is set
+	 */
+	blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, at_head, true, false);
+}
+
+
 /**
  * blk_execute_rq_nowait - insert a request to I/O scheduler for execution
  * @rq:		request to insert
@@ -1184,18 +1240,8 @@ static void blk_end_sync_rq(struct request *rq, blk_status_t error)
  */
 void blk_execute_rq_nowait(struct request *rq, bool at_head, rq_end_io_fn *done)
 {
-	WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());
-	WARN_ON(!blk_rq_is_passthrough(rq));
-
-	rq->end_io = done;
-
-	blk_account_io_start(rq);
+	__blk_execute_rq_nowait(rq, at_head, done, true);
 
-	/*
-	 * don't check dying flag for MQ because the request won't
-	 * be reused after dying flag is set
-	 */
-	blk_mq_sched_insert_request(rq, at_head, true, false);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_execute_rq_nowait);
 
@@ -1234,7 +1280,7 @@ blk_status_t blk_execute_rq(struct request *rq, bool at_head)
 	unsigned long hang_check;
 
 	rq->end_io_data = &wait;
-	blk_execute_rq_nowait(rq, at_head, blk_end_sync_rq);
+	__blk_execute_rq_nowait(rq, at_head, blk_end_sync_rq, false);
 
 	/* Prevent hang_check timer from firing at us during very long I/O */
 	hang_check = sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs;
@@ -2340,40 +2386,6 @@ void __blk_mq_insert_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, struct request *rq,
 	blk_mq_hctx_mark_pending(hctx, ctx);
 }
 
-/*
- * Allow 2x BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT requests on plug queue for multiple
- * queues. This is important for md arrays to benefit from merging
- * requests.
- */
-static inline unsigned short blk_plug_max_rq_count(struct blk_plug *plug)
-{
-	if (plug->multiple_queues)
-		return BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT * 2;
-	return BLK_MAX_REQUEST_COUNT;
-}
-
-static void blk_add_rq_to_plug(struct blk_plug *plug, struct request *rq)
-{
-	struct request *last = rq_list_peek(&plug->mq_list);
-
-	if (!plug->rq_count) {
-		trace_block_plug(rq->q);
-	} else if (plug->rq_count >= blk_plug_max_rq_count(plug) ||
-		   (!blk_queue_nomerges(rq->q) &&
-		    blk_rq_bytes(last) >= BLK_PLUG_FLUSH_SIZE)) {
-		blk_mq_flush_plug_list(plug, false);
-		trace_block_plug(rq->q);
-	}
-
-	if (!plug->multiple_queues && last && last->q != rq->q)
-		plug->multiple_queues = true;
-	if (!plug->has_elevator && (rq->rq_flags & RQF_ELV))
-		plug->has_elevator = true;
-	rq->rq_next = NULL;
-	rq_list_add(&plug->mq_list, rq);
-	plug->rq_count++;
-}
-
 /**
  * blk_mq_request_bypass_insert - Insert a request at dispatch list.
  * @rq: Pointer to request to be inserted.
@@ -2387,12 +2399,7 @@ void blk_mq_request_bypass_insert(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
 				  bool run_queue)
 {
 	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx = rq->mq_hctx;
-	struct blk_plug *plug = current->plug;
 
-	if (plug) {
-		blk_add_rq_to_plug(plug, rq);
-		return;
-	}
 	spin_lock(&hctx->lock);
 	if (at_head)
 		list_add(&rq->queuelist, &hctx->dispatch);


Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-12  5:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20220511055306epcas5p3bf3b4c1e32d2bb43db12785bd7caf5da@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-05-11  5:47 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] io_uring passthrough for nvme Kanchan Joshi
     [not found]   ` <CGME20220511055308epcas5p3627bcb0ec10d7a2222e701898e9ad0db@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-05-11  5:47     ` [PATCH v5 1/6] fs,io_uring: add infrastructure for uring-cmd Kanchan Joshi
2022-05-11 12:42       ` Christoph Hellwig
     [not found]   ` <CGME20220511055310epcas5p46650f5b6fe963279f686b8f50a98a286@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-05-11  5:47     ` [PATCH v5 2/6] block: wire-up support for passthrough plugging Kanchan Joshi
2022-05-12  5:25       ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-05-12  8:09         ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-12  8:44           ` Ming Lei
2022-05-12 12:31             ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-12 11:50         ` Anuj Gupta
2022-05-12 14:06           ` Ming Lei
     [not found]   ` <CGME20220511055312epcas5p3b1e9989a32cb1a79f8a941476fc433d1@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2022-05-11  5:47     ` [PATCH v5 3/6] nvme: refactor nvme_submit_user_cmd() Kanchan Joshi
     [not found]   ` <CGME20220511055314epcas5p42ddbc17608f2677814c07b0d790e1318@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2022-05-11  5:47     ` [PATCH v5 4/6] nvme: wire-up uring-cmd support for io-passthru on char-device Kanchan Joshi
     [not found]   ` <CGME20220511055319epcas5p1d78cb03bd1b145a6d58c8e616795af14@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2022-05-11  5:47     ` [PATCH v5 5/6] nvme: add vectored-io support for uring-cmd Kanchan Joshi
     [not found]   ` <CGME20220511055320epcas5p2457aaf8e7405387282f60831f5a4eca9@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2022-05-11  5:47     ` [PATCH v5 6/6] io_uring: finish IOPOLL/ioprio prep handler removal Kanchan Joshi
2022-05-11  6:54       ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-11 11:05         ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-05-11 12:38         ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-11 12:39   ` [PATCH v5 0/6] io_uring passthrough for nvme Jens Axboe
2022-05-11 13:14     ` Kanchan Joshi
2022-05-11 13:39       ` Jens Axboe
2022-05-11 13:48   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YnyaRB+u1x6nIVp1@T590 \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox