From: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
To: Anuj Gupta <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected],
Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 06/10] io_uring: introduce attributes for read/write and PI support
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 10:04:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 04:52:36PM +0530, Anuj Gupta wrote:
> Add the ability to pass additional attributes along with read/write.
> Application can prepare attibute specific information and pass its
> address using the SQE field:
> __u64 attr_ptr;
>
> Along with setting a mask indicating attributes being passed:
> __u64 attr_type_mask;
>
> Overall 64 attributes are allowed and currently one attribute
> 'IORING_RW_ATTR_FLAG_PI' is supported.
>
> With PI attribute, userspace can pass following information:
> - flags: integrity check flags IO_INTEGRITY_CHK_{GUARD/APPTAG/REFTAG}
> - len: length of PI/metadata buffer
> - addr: address of metadata buffer
> - seed: seed value for reftag remapping
> - app_tag: application defined 16b value
>
> Process this information to prepare uio_meta_descriptor and pass it down
> using kiocb->private.
>
> PI attribute is supported only for direct IO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anuj Gupta <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h | 16 +++++++
> io_uring/io_uring.c | 2 +
> io_uring/rw.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> io_uring/rw.h | 14 +++++-
> 4 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> index aac9a4f8fa9a..38f0d6b10eaf 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/io_uring.h
> @@ -98,6 +98,10 @@ struct io_uring_sqe {
> __u64 addr3;
> __u64 __pad2[1];
> };
> + struct {
> + __u64 attr_ptr; /* pointer to attribute information */
> + __u64 attr_type_mask; /* bit mask of attributes */
> + };
I can't say I'm a fan of how this turned out. I'm merging up the write
hint stuff, and these new fields occupy where that 16-bit value was
initially going. Okay, so I guess I need to just add a new attribute
flag? That might work if I am only appending exactly one extra attribute
per SQE, but what if I need both PI and Write Hint? Do the attributes
need to appear in a strict order?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-05 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20241128113036epcas5p397ba228852b72fff671fe695c322a3ef@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-11-28 11:22 ` [PATCH v11 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241128113056epcas5p2c9278736c88c646e6f3c7480ffb2211f@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-11-28 11:22 ` [PATCH v11 01/10] block: define set of integrity flags to be inherited by cloned bip Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241128113058epcas5p1f544aa328a27b59f96b48b94dc0bdf94@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2024-11-28 11:22 ` [PATCH v11 02/10] block: copy back bounce buffer to user-space correctly in case of split Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241128113101epcas5p3fefab67892c16c7bbaba8063c5c4a2c1@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-11-28 11:22 ` [PATCH v11 03/10] block: modify bio_integrity_map_user to accept iov_iter as argument Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241128113104epcas5p4c4bd9f936403295e4cbac7c1f52d9b30@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-11-28 11:22 ` [PATCH v11 04/10] fs, iov_iter: define meta io descriptor Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241128113106epcas5p1b5b06683bfa72225f3c1ab102b9f361c@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2024-11-28 11:22 ` [PATCH v11 05/10] fs: introduce IOCB_HAS_METADATA for metadata Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241128113109epcas5p46022c85174da65853c85a8848b32f164@epcas5p4.samsung.com>
2024-11-28 11:22 ` [PATCH v11 06/10] io_uring: introduce attributes for read/write and PI support Anuj Gupta
2024-12-03 2:13 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-12-03 6:56 ` Anuj Gupta
2024-12-03 12:00 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-12-04 8:09 ` Anuj Gupta
2024-12-05 18:04 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2024-12-05 20:17 ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-12-06 12:07 ` Pavel Begunkov
[not found] ` <CGME20241128113112epcas5p186ef86baaa3054effb7244c54ee2f991@epcas5p1.samsung.com>
2024-11-28 11:22 ` [PATCH v11 07/10] block: introduce BIP_CHECK_GUARD/REFTAG/APPTAG bip_flags Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241128113114epcas5p29c7e2a71a136cb50c636a9fe5d87bb0b@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-11-28 11:22 ` [PATCH v11 08/10] nvme: add support for passing on the application tag Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241128113117epcas5p3b0387c302753c5424ba410f5b38ddeb9@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-11-28 11:22 ` [PATCH v11 09/10] scsi: add support for user-meta interface Anuj Gupta
[not found] ` <CGME20241128113120epcas5p3bd415b5a09b3d5b793cbdda0b4102a62@epcas5p3.samsung.com>
2024-11-28 11:22 ` [PATCH v11 10/10] block: add support to pass user meta buffer Anuj Gupta
2024-11-29 16:04 ` [PATCH v11 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox