public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], Bernhard Schmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Bug#1093243: Upgrade to 6.1.123 kernel causes mariadb hangs
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 21:05:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

Hi all,

On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 08:49:13PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://jira.mariadb.org/projects/MDEV/issues/MDEV-35886
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 08:06:18PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > Control: affects -1 src:mariadb
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > Control: severity -1 critical
> > 
> > Seeing this too. We have two standalone systems running the stock
> > bookworm MariaDB and the opensource network management system LibreNMS,
> > which is quite write-heavy. After some time (sometimes a couple of
> > hours, sometimes 1-2 days) all connection slots to the database are
> > full.
> > 
> > When you kill one client process you can connect and issue "show
> > processlist", you see all slots busy with easy update/select queries
> > that have been running for hours. You need to SIGKILL mariadbd to
> > recover.
> > 
> > The last two days our colleagues running a Galera cluster (unsure about
> > the version, inquiring) have been affected by this as well. They found
> > an mariadb bug report about this.
> > 
> > https://jira.mariadb.org/projects/MDEV/issues/MDEV-35886?filter=allopenissues
> > 
> > Since there have been reports about data loss I think it warrants
> > increasing the severity to critical.
> > 
> > I'm not 100% sure about -30 though, we have been downgrading the
> > production system to -28 and upgraded the test system to -30, and both
> > are working fine. The test system has less load though, and I trust the
> > reports here that -30 is still broken.
> 
> I would be interested to know if someone is able to reproduce the
> issue more in under lab conditions, which would enable us to bisect
> the issue.
> 
> As a start I set the above issue as a forward, to have the issues
> linked (and we later on can update it to the linux upstream report).

I suspect this might be introduced by one of the io_uring related
changes between 6.1.119 and 6.1.123. 

But we need to be able to trigger the issue in an environment not in
production, and then bisect those upstream changes. I'm still looping
in already Jens Axboe if this rings some bell.

Jens, for context, we have reports in Debian about MariaDB hangs after
updating from 6.1.119 based kernel to 6.1.123 (and 6.1.144) as
reported in https://bugs.debian.org/1093243

Regards,
Salvatore

       reply	other threads:[~2025-01-23 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <173706089225.4380.9492796104667651797.reportbug@backup22.biblionix.com>
     [not found] ` <[email protected]>
     [not found]   ` <[email protected]>
     [not found]     ` <[email protected]>
2025-01-23 20:05       ` Salvatore Bonaccorso [this message]
2025-01-23 20:26         ` Bug#1093243: Upgrade to 6.1.123 kernel causes mariadb hangs Jens Axboe
     [not found] ` <[email protected]>
2025-01-23 20:49   ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-01-23 23:20     ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-24  2:10       ` Xan Charbonnet
2025-01-24  5:24       ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-01-24 10:33         ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-24 16:30           ` Xan Charbonnet
2025-01-24 18:40             ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-24 20:33               ` Salvatore Bonaccorso
2025-01-24 20:51                 ` Jens Axboe
2025-01-26 22:48                   ` Xan Charbonnet
2025-01-27 16:38                     ` Xan Charbonnet
2025-01-27 17:21                       ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-01-27 16:49                     ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox