From: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
To: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
Cc: Keith Busch <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/6] io_uring: add support for kernel registered bvecs
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 08:26:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z69gmZs4BcBFqWbP@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z664w0GrgA8LjYko@fedora>
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 11:30:11AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 04:56:43PM -0800, Keith Busch wrote:
> > +
> > + node->release = release;
> > + node->priv = rq;
> > +
> > + nr_bvecs = blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq);
> > + imu = kvmalloc(struct_size(imu, bvec, nr_bvecs), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!imu) {
> > + kfree(node);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > +
> > + imu->ubuf = 0;
> > + imu->len = blk_rq_bytes(rq);
> > + imu->acct_pages = 0;
> > + imu->nr_bvecs = nr_bvecs;
> > + refcount_set(&imu->refs, 1);
> > + node->buf = imu;
>
> request buffer direction needs to be stored in `imu`, for READ,
> the buffer is write-only, and for WRITE, the buffer is read-only,
> which isn't different with user mapped buffer.
>
> Meantime in read_fixed/write_fixed side or buffer lookup abstraction
> helper, the buffer direction needs to be validated.
I suppose we could add that check, but the primary use case doesn't even
use those operations. They're using uring_cmd with the FIXED flag, and
io_uring can't readily validate the data direction from that interface.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-14 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 0:56 [PATCHv2 0/6] ublk zero-copy support Keith Busch
2025-02-11 0:56 ` [PATCHv2 1/6] io_uring: use node for import Keith Busch
2025-02-11 0:56 ` [PATCHv2 2/6] io_uring: create resource release callback Keith Busch
2025-02-13 1:31 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-13 1:58 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-13 13:06 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-11 0:56 ` [PATCHv2 3/6] io_uring: add support for kernel registered bvecs Keith Busch
2025-02-13 1:33 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-14 3:30 ` Ming Lei
2025-02-14 15:26 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-02-15 1:34 ` Ming Lei
2025-02-18 20:34 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-11 0:56 ` [PATCHv2 4/6] ublk: zc register/unregister bvec Keith Busch
2025-02-12 2:49 ` Ming Lei
2025-02-12 4:11 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-12 9:24 ` Ming Lei
2025-02-12 14:59 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-13 2:12 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-11 0:56 ` [PATCHv2 5/6] io_uring: add abstraction for buf_table rsrc data Keith Busch
2025-02-11 0:56 ` [PATCHv2 6/6] io_uring: cache nodes and mapped buffers Keith Busch
2025-02-11 16:47 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-12 2:29 ` [PATCHv2 0/6] ublk zero-copy support Ming Lei
2025-02-12 15:28 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-12 16:06 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-02-13 1:52 ` Ming Lei
2025-02-13 15:12 ` lizetao
2025-02-13 16:06 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-14 3:39 ` lizetao
2025-02-14 2:41 ` Ming Lei
2025-02-14 4:21 ` lizetao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z69gmZs4BcBFqWbP@kbusch-mbp \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox