public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <[email protected]>,
	Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], Dave Chinner <[email protected]>,
	[email protected], [email protected],
	wu lei <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] iomap: propagate nowait to block layer
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:34:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 12:45:52AM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> It's not something recent. After some digging I think the
> one I remember is
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
> 
> Remove by
> 
> commit 7b6620d7db566a46f49b4b9deab9fa061fd4b59b
> Author: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> Date:   Thu Aug 15 11:09:16 2019 -0600
> 
>     block: remove REQ_NOWAIT_INLINE

That does indeed look pretty broken, mostly because it doesn't actually
return the errors inline as return values but tries to emulate it.

> > If you don't want to do synchronous wouldblock errors that's your
> > only option.  I think it would suck badly, but it's certainly easier
> > to backport.
> 
> Is there some intrinsic difference of iomap from the block file
> in block/fops.c? Or is that one broken?

block/fops.c has roughly the same issue, but it's not anywhere near
as sever, as block/fops.c doesn't have any file system state that
gets confused by the async BLK_STS_AGAIN.  But unless io_uring knows
how to rewind the state for that case it probably also doesn't work
properly.  It might be worth to look into testcases that actually
exercise the nowait I/O on block devices with annoyingly small limits
or that split a lot (like RAID0).


  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-05  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-04 12:18 [PATCH v2 1/1] iomap: propagate nowait to block layer Pavel Begunkov
2025-03-04 16:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-04 16:41   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-03-04 16:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-04 17:36       ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-04 23:26         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-04 23:43           ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-04 23:49             ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05  0:14               ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-03-05  0:18                 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-03-04 17:54       ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-03-04 23:28         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-04 19:22     ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-04 20:35       ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-03-05  0:01         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05  0:45           ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-03-05  1:34             ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-03-04 21:11 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-04 22:47   ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-03-04 23:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05  1:19     ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-05 14:10       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox