From: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: io-uring <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring/rw: transform single vector readv/writev into ubuf
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 17:54:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZB44PG+EFK4Xid/[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 08:35:38AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> @@ -402,7 +402,22 @@ static struct iovec *__io_import_iovec(int ddir, struct io_kiocb *req,
> req->ctx->compat);
> if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> return ERR_PTR(ret);
> - return iovec;
> + if (iter->nr_segs != 1)
> + return iovec;
> + /*
> + * Convert to non-vectored request if we have a single segment. If we
> + * need to defer the request, then we no longer have to allocate and
> + * maintain a struct io_async_rw. Additionally, we won't have cleanup
> + * to do at completion time
> + */
> + rw->addr = (unsigned long) iter->iov[0].iov_base;
> + rw->len = iter->iov[0].iov_len;
> + iov_iter_ubuf(iter, ddir, iter->iov[0].iov_base, rw->len);
> + /* readv -> read distance is the same as writev -> write */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON((IORING_OP_READ - IORING_OP_READV) !=
> + (IORING_OP_WRITE - IORING_OP_WRITEV));
> + req->opcode += (IORING_OP_READ - IORING_OP_READV);
> + return NULL;
> }
This may break anyone using io_uring with those bizarre drivers that have
entirely different readv semantics from normal read. I think we can safely say
no one's using io_uring for such interfaces, so probably a moot point. If you
wanted to be extra cautious though, you may want to skip this transformation if
the file->f_op implements both .read+read_iter and .write+.write_iter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-24 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-24 14:35 [PATCH] io_uring/rw: transform single vector readv/writev into ubuf Jens Axboe
2023-03-24 22:41 ` Ming Lei
2023-03-24 23:06 ` Jens Axboe
2023-03-25 0:24 ` Ming Lei
2023-03-27 11:45 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-03-24 23:54 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2023-03-25 1:06 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZB44PG+EFK4Xid/[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox