From: Dave Chinner <[email protected]>
To: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>, Clay Harris <[email protected]>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/29] xfs: support nowait for xfs_buf_read_map()
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2023 07:53:50 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZOki7u/[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 09:54:26PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>
> This causes xfstests generic/232 hung in umount process, waiting for ail
> push, so I comment it for now, need some hints from xfs folks.
> Not a real patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> index cdad80e1ae25..284962a9f31a 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
> @@ -828,6 +828,13 @@ xfs_buf_read_map(
> trace_xfs_buf_read(bp, flags, _RET_IP_);
>
> if (!(bp->b_flags & XBF_DONE)) {
> +// /*
> +// * Let's bypass the _xfs_buf_read() for now
> +// */
> +// if (flags & XBF_NOWAIT) {
> +// xfs_buf_relse(bp);
> +// return -EAGAIN;
> +// }
This is *fundamentally broken*, and apart from anything else breaks
readahead.
IF we asked for a read, we cannot instantiate the buffer and then
*not issue any IO on it* and release it. That leaves an
uninitialised buffer in memory, and there's every chance that
something then trips over it and bad things happen.
A buffer like this *must* be errored out and marked stale so that
the next access to it will then re-initialise the buffer state and
trigger any preparatory work that needs to be done for the new
operation.
This comes back to my first comments that XBF_TRYLOCK cannot simpy
be replaced with XBF_NOWAIT semantics...
-Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
[email protected]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-25 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-25 13:54 [PATCH RFC v5 00/29] io_uring getdents Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 01/29] fs: split off vfs_getdents function of getdents64 syscall Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 02/29] xfs: rename XBF_TRYLOCK to XBF_NOWAIT Hao Xu
2023-08-25 21:39 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 03/29] xfs: add NOWAIT semantics for readdir Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 04/29] vfs: add nowait flag for struct dir_context Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 05/29] vfs: add a vfs helper for io_uring file pos lock Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 06/29] vfs: add file_pos_unlock() for io_uring usage Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 07/29] vfs: add a nowait parameter for touch_atime() Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 08/29] vfs: add nowait parameter for file_accessed() Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 09/29] vfs: move file_accessed() to the beginning of iterate_dir() Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 10/29] vfs: add S_NOWAIT for nowait time update Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 11/29] vfs: trylock inode->i_rwsem in iterate_dir() to support nowait Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 12/29] xfs: enforce GFP_NOIO implicitly during nowait time update Hao Xu
2023-08-25 14:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 13/29] xfs: make xfs_trans_alloc() support nowait semantics Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 14/29] xfs: support nowait for xfs_log_reserve() Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 15/29] xfs: don't wait for free space in xlog_grant_head_check() in nowait case Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 16/29] xfs: add nowait parameter for xfs_inode_item_init() Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 17/29] xfs: make xfs_trans_ijoin() error out -EAGAIN Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 18/29] xfs: set XBF_NOWAIT for xfs_buf_read_map if necessary Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 19/29] xfs: support nowait memory allocation in _xfs_buf_alloc() Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 20/29] xfs: distinguish error type of memory allocation failure for nowait case Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 21/29] xfs: return -EAGAIN when bulk memory allocation fails in " Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 22/29] xfs: comment page allocation for nowait case in xfs_buf_find_insert() Hao Xu
2023-08-25 14:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 23/29] xfs: don't print warn info for -EAGAIN error in xfs_buf_get_map() Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 24/29] xfs: support nowait for xfs_buf_read_map() Hao Xu
2023-08-25 21:53 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 25/29] xfs: support nowait for xfs_buf_item_init() Hao Xu
2023-08-25 22:16 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 26/29] xfs: return -EAGAIN when nowait meets sync in transaction commit Hao Xu
2023-08-25 21:58 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 27/29] xfs: add a comment for xlog_kvmalloc() Hao Xu
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 28/29] xfs: support nowait semantics for xc_ctx_lock in xlog_cil_commit() Hao Xu
2023-08-25 21:59 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-25 13:54 ` [PATCH 29/29] io_uring: add support for getdents Hao Xu
2023-08-25 15:11 ` [PATCH RFC v5 00/29] io_uring getdents Darrick J. Wong
2023-08-25 22:53 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZOki7u/[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox