From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
To: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>,
Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Christian Brauner <[email protected]>,
Alexander Viro <[email protected]>,
Stefan Roesch <[email protected]>, Clay Harris <[email protected]>,
Dave Chinner <[email protected]>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] xfs: add NOWAIT semantics for readdir
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2023 21:44:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 09:28:26PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote:
> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c
> @@ -2643,16 +2643,32 @@ xfs_da_read_buf(
> struct xfs_buf_map map, *mapp = ↦
> int nmap = 1;
> int error;
> + int buf_flags = 0;
>
> *bpp = NULL;
> error = xfs_dabuf_map(dp, bno, flags, whichfork, &mapp, &nmap);
> if (error || !nmap)
> goto out_free;
>
> + /*
> + * NOWAIT semantics mean we don't wait on the buffer lock nor do we
> + * issue IO for this buffer if it is not already in memory. Caller will
> + * retry. This will return -EAGAIN if the buffer is in memory and cannot
> + * be locked, and no buffer and no error if it isn't in memory. We
> + * translate both of those into a return state of -EAGAIN and *bpp =
> + * NULL.
> + */
I would not include this comment.
> + if (flags & XFS_DABUF_NOWAIT)
> + buf_flags |= XBF_TRYLOCK | XBF_INCORE;
> error = xfs_trans_read_buf_map(mp, tp, mp->m_ddev_targp, mapp, nmap, 0,
> &bp, ops);
what tsting did you do with this? Because you don't actually _use_
buf_flags anywhere in this patch (presumably they should be the
sixth argument to xfs_trans_read_buf_map() instead of 0). So I can only
conclude that either you didn't test, or your testing was inadequate.
> if (error)
> goto out_free;
> + if (!bp) {
> + ASSERT(flags & XFS_DABUF_NOWAIT);
I don't think this ASSERT is appropriate.
> @@ -391,10 +401,17 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents(
> bp = NULL;
> }
>
> - if (*lock_mode == 0)
> - *lock_mode = xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(dp);
> + if (*lock_mode == 0) {
> + *lock_mode =
> + xfs_ilock_data_map_shared_generic(dp,
> + ctx->flags & DIR_CONTEXT_F_NOWAIT);
> + if (!*lock_mode) {
> + error = -EAGAIN;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
'generic' doesn't seem like a great suffix to mean 'takes nowait flag'.
And this is far too far indented.
xfs_dir2_lock(dp, ctx, lock_mode);
with:
STATIC void xfs_dir2_lock(struct xfs_inode *dp, struct dir_context *ctx,
unsigned int lock_mode)
{
if (*lock_mode)
return;
if (ctx->flags & DIR_CONTEXT_F_NOWAIT)
return xfs_ilock_data_map_shared_nowait(dp);
return xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(dp);
}
... which I think you can use elsewhere in this patch (reformat it to
XFS coding style, of course). And then you don't need
xfs_ilock_data_map_shared_generic().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-27 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-27 13:28 [PATCH v6 00/11] io_uring getdents Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 01/11] fs: split off vfs_getdents function of getdents64 syscall Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: add NOWAIT semantics for readdir Hao Xu
2023-08-27 20:44 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2023-08-29 7:41 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-29 13:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-09-04 1:02 ` Dave Chinner
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 03/11] vfs: add nowait flag for struct dir_context Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 04/11] vfs: add a vfs helper for io_uring file pos lock Hao Xu
2023-08-27 20:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 05/11] vfs: add file_pos_unlock() for io_uring usage Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 06/11] vfs: add a nowait parameter for touch_atime() Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 07/11] vfs: add nowait parameter for file_accessed() Hao Xu
2023-08-27 21:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-29 7:46 ` Hao Xu
2023-08-29 11:53 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-30 6:11 ` Hao Xu
2023-09-03 22:30 ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-08 0:29 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-09-10 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2023-09-04 9:51 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 08/11] vfs: move file_accessed() to the beginning of iterate_dir() Hao Xu
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 09/11] vfs: error out -EAGAIN if atime needs to be updated Hao Xu
2023-08-27 20:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 10/11] vfs: trylock inode->i_rwsem in iterate_dir() to support nowait Hao Xu
2023-09-04 9:37 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-27 13:28 ` [PATCH 11/11] io_uring: add support for getdents Hao Xu
2023-09-04 9:57 ` [PATCH v6 00/11] io_uring getdents Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox