From: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
To: Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Cc: Keith Busch <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] block: bio-integrity: directly map user buffers
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 08:08:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 03:55:14PM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> On 11/6/2023 8:32 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 11:18:03AM +0530, Kanchan Joshi wrote:
> >> On 10/27/2023 11:49 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> >>> + for (i = 0; i < nr_vecs; i = j) {
> >>> + size_t size = min_t(size_t, bytes, PAGE_SIZE - offs);
> >>> + struct folio *folio = page_folio(pages[i]);
> >>> +
> >>> + bytes -= size;
> >>> + for (j = i + 1; j < nr_vecs; j++) {
> >>> + size_t next = min_t(size_t, PAGE_SIZE, bytes);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (page_folio(pages[j]) != folio ||
> >>> + pages[j] != pages[j - 1] + 1)
> >>> + break;
> >>> + unpin_user_page(pages[j]);
> >>
> >> Is this unpin correct here?
> >
> > Should be. The pages are bound to the folio, so this doesn't really
> > unpin the user page. It just drops a reference, and the folio holds the
> > final reference to the contiguous pages, which is released on
> > completion.
>
> But the completion is still going to see multiple pages and not one
> (folio). The bip_for_each_vec loop is going to drop the reference again.
> I suspect it is not folio-aware.
The completion unpins once per bvec, not individual pages. The setup
creates multipage bvecs with only one pin remaining per bvec for all of
the bvec's pages. If a page can't be merged into the current bvec, then
that page is not unpinned and becomes the first page of to the next
bvec.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-07 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-27 18:19 [PATCHv2 0/4] block integrity: directly map user space addresses Keith Busch
2023-10-27 18:19 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] block: bio-integrity: directly map user buffers Keith Busch
[not found] ` <CGME20231030144050eucas1p12ede963088687846d9b02a27d7da525e@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2023-10-30 14:40 ` Pankaj Raghav
2023-10-30 14:54 ` Keith Busch
2023-10-30 15:27 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-30 21:02 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-10-30 21:25 ` Keith Busch
2023-10-31 0:13 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-31 2:46 ` kernel test robot
2023-11-06 5:48 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-11-06 15:02 ` Keith Busch
2023-11-07 10:25 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-11-07 15:08 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2023-11-08 12:15 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-11-08 17:19 ` Keith Busch
2023-10-27 18:19 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] nvme: use bio_integrity_map_user Keith Busch
2023-10-27 18:19 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] iouring: remove IORING_URING_CMD_POLLED Keith Busch
2023-10-27 18:19 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] io_uring: remove uring_cmd cookie Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox