From: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
To: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <[email protected]>, Keith Busch <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iouring: one capable call per iouring instance
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 12:14:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZW6jjiq9wXHm5d10@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZW4hM0H6pjbCpIg9@kbusch-mbp>
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 11:57:55AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 01:40:58PM -0500, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > I added a CC: linux-security-module@vger
> > Keith Busch <[email protected]> writes:
> > > From: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > The uring_cmd operation is often used for privileged actions, so drivers
> > > subscribing to this interface check capable() for each command. The
> > > capable() function is not fast path friendly for many kernel configs,
> > > and this can really harm performance. Stash the capable sys admin
> > > attribute in the io_uring context and set a new issue_flag for the
> > > uring_cmd interface.
> >
> > I have a few questions. What privileged actions are performance
> > sensitive? I would hope that anything requiring privileges would not
> > be in a fast path (but clearly that's not the case).
>
> Protocol specifics that don't have a generic equivalent. For example,
> NVMe FDP is reachable only through the uring_cmd and ioctl interfaces,
> but you use it like normal reads and writes so has to be as fast as the
> generic interfaces.
But normal read/write pt command doesn't require ADMIN any more since
commit 855b7717f44b ("nvme: fine-granular CAP_SYS_ADMIN for nvme io commands"),
why do you have to pay the cost of checking capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)?
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-05 4:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 17:53 [PATCH 1/2] iouring: one capable call per iouring instance Keith Busch
2023-12-04 17:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: use uring_cmd sys_admin flag Keith Busch
2023-12-04 18:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] iouring: one capable call per iouring instance Jens Axboe
2023-12-04 18:45 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-12-05 16:21 ` Kanchan Joshi
2023-12-06 21:09 ` Keith Busch
2023-12-04 18:15 ` Jens Axboe
2023-12-04 18:40 ` Jeff Moyer
2023-12-04 18:57 ` Keith Busch
2023-12-05 4:14 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2023-12-05 4:31 ` Keith Busch
2023-12-05 5:25 ` Ming Lei
2023-12-05 15:45 ` Keith Busch
2023-12-06 3:08 ` Ming Lei
2023-12-06 15:31 ` Keith Busch
2023-12-07 1:23 ` Ming Lei
2023-12-07 17:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-04 19:01 ` Jens Axboe
2023-12-04 19:22 ` Jeff Moyer
2023-12-04 19:33 ` Jens Axboe
2023-12-04 19:37 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZW6jjiq9wXHm5d10@fedora \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox