From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9A4D2F4A for ; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 13:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710597384; cv=none; b=XHTZi0cdQHzxVBtRbXVu051R87WmONzrMo9/XZn15iJ/v1SIuo17wRM5CO6RoR2g8/OWCGbbVKKhgXf0l6yVstRd5y3pbHbZq8hj8X5aLog/yGTEHiiwVHUxRaHHOs6cJQ/vS1QPRqnl6JrOOh67Vw+3daPw7wN0FFTUbeoooVk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710597384; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HwZY4WJc6gF+kop719+5t8mex0n8bh9ueyo0bCmtDIo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jzXNt5Y8Vv6/aJNaUABE1ak8B5NlpCAaClvn9hE9eDibHdC9qecz+wodFs8IIkJ3dvStcexfnzkBGBqIIA+2DgrqSz+jpSVBPXMCvzw4WSJS3mQTtQ31mfew7OHawp9VeOw825LB8Rkx2XTHerEp+D/eY0BAnlTyHGzAgzavXTU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=E+AosMuD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="E+AosMuD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1710597379; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3IyaeP4KTYSzl2Jnd9bGwqrGlMEQfY44kHWhoVyV14c=; b=E+AosMuDWZpVJGwKoSt6g4dJv8XpM20V90Yli5WEls7SiQ0oTUucmzkpSfwQSHigkie1Gi Yhbjg9WuEXUfhURhYC3rnYLZ1PsaVxBOOHkCFimZnhKZpGbE+OJfsXcA748ylSSKqTn6Ic qYHUYsieNk4wSmB1jFAzux4Jata0epE= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-635-yOdP-w9QNru1BzIxNkCGUw-1; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 09:56:16 -0400 X-MC-Unique: yOdP-w9QNru1BzIxNkCGUw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 136FF85A58C; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 13:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora (unknown [10.72.116.22]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC3811121312; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 13:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:56:04 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Pavel Begunkov Cc: Jens Axboe , io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Kanchan Joshi Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH 00/11] remove aux CQE caches Message-ID: References: <171054320158.386037.13510354610893597382.b4-ty@kernel.dk> <29b950aa-d3c3-4237-a146-c6abd7b68b8f@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <29b950aa-d3c3-4237-a146-c6abd7b68b8f@gmail.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.3 On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 01:27:17PM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote: > On 3/16/24 11:52, Ming Lei wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 04:53:21PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: ... > > The following two error can be triggered with this patchset > > when running some ublk stress test(io vs. deletion). And not see > > such failures after reverting the 11 patches. > > I suppose it's with the fix from yesterday. How can I > reproduce it, blktests? Yeah, it needs yesterday's fix. You may need to run this test multiple times for triggering the problem: 1) git clone https://github.com/ublk-org/ublksrv.git 2) cd ublksrv 3) make test T=generic/004 Thanks, Ming