public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
	Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] ublk: don't hard code IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 16:16:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zff4ShMEcL1WKZ1Q@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3928d3de14d2569efc2edd7fb654a4795ae7f86.1710720150.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 18, 2024 at 12:41:50AM +0000, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> uring_cmd implementations should not try to guess issue_flags, just use
> a newly added io_uring_cmd_complete(). We're loosing an optimisation in
> the cancellation path in ublk_uring_cmd_cancel_fn(), but the assumption
> is that we don't care that much about it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2f7bc9fbc98b11412d10b8fd88e58e35614e3147.1710514702.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/block/ublk_drv.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> index bea3d5cf8a83..97dceecadab2 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/ublk_drv.c
> @@ -1417,8 +1417,7 @@ static bool ublk_abort_requests(struct ublk_device *ub, struct ublk_queue *ubq)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -static void ublk_cancel_cmd(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io,
> -		unsigned int issue_flags)
> +static void ublk_cancel_cmd(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io)
>  {
>  	bool done;
>  
> @@ -1432,15 +1431,14 @@ static void ublk_cancel_cmd(struct ublk_queue *ubq, struct ublk_io *io,
>  	spin_unlock(&ubq->cancel_lock);
>  
>  	if (!done)
> -		io_uring_cmd_done(io->cmd, UBLK_IO_RES_ABORT, 0, issue_flags);
> +		io_uring_cmd_complete(io->cmd, UBLK_IO_RES_ABORT, 0);
>  }
>  
>  /*
>   * The ublk char device won't be closed when calling cancel fn, so both
>   * ublk device and queue are guaranteed to be live
>   */
> -static void ublk_uring_cmd_cancel_fn(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
> -		unsigned int issue_flags)
> +static void ublk_uring_cmd_cancel_fn(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd)
>  {
>  	struct ublk_uring_cmd_pdu *pdu = ublk_get_uring_cmd_pdu(cmd);
>  	struct ublk_queue *ubq = pdu->ubq;
> @@ -1464,7 +1462,7 @@ static void ublk_uring_cmd_cancel_fn(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd,
>  
>  	io = &ubq->ios[pdu->tag];
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(io->cmd != cmd);
> -	ublk_cancel_cmd(ubq, io, issue_flags);
> +	ublk_cancel_cmd(ubq, io);

.cancel_fn is always called with .uring_lock held, so this 'issue_flags' can't
be removed, otherwise double task run is caused because .cancel_fn
can be called multiple times if the request stays in ctx->cancelable_uring_cmd.


Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-18  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-18  0:41 [PATCH v2 00/14] remove aux CQE caches Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] io_uring/cmd: kill one issue_flags to tw conversion Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] io_uring/cmd: fix tw <-> issue_flags conversion Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  2:23   ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18  2:25     ` Jens Axboe
2024-03-18  2:32       ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  2:40         ` Jens Axboe
2024-03-18  2:43           ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  2:46             ` Jens Axboe
2024-03-18  2:47           ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18  3:11             ` Jens Axboe
2024-03-18  3:24               ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  6:59               ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18 11:45                 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] io_uring/cmd: make io_uring_cmd_done irq safe Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  8:10   ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18 11:50     ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 11:59       ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18 12:46         ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 13:09           ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] io_uring/cmd: introduce io_uring_cmd_complete Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] ublk: don't hard code IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  8:16   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-03-18 12:52     ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 13:37       ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 14:32         ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 14:39           ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18 14:34       ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18 15:08         ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 15:16           ` Ming Lei
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] nvme/io_uring: " Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18 13:26   ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-03-18 13:38     ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] io_uring/rw: avoid punting to io-wq directly Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] io_uring: force tw ctx locking Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] io_uring: remove struct io_tw_state::locked Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] io_uring: refactor io_fill_cqe_req_aux Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] io_uring: get rid of intermediate aux cqe caches Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] io_uring: remove current check from complete_post Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] io_uring: refactor io_req_complete_post() Pavel Begunkov
2024-03-18  0:41 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] io_uring: clean up io_lockdep_assert_cq_locked Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zff4ShMEcL1WKZ1Q@fedora \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox