From: Luis Chamberlain <[email protected]>
To: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Cc: John Garry <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
Himanshu Madhani <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 05/10] block: Add core atomic write support
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 16:34:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 10:11:50AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/26/24 06:38, John Garry wrote:
> > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
> > index 1fe9a553c37b..4c775f4bdefe 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
> > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-block
> > +What: /sys/block/<disk>/atomic_write_boundary_bytes
> > +Date: February 2024
> > +Contact: Himanshu Madhani <[email protected]>
> > +Description:
> > + [RO] A device may need to internally split I/Os which
> > + straddle a given logical block address boundary. In that
> > + case a single atomic write operation will be processed as
> > + one of more sub-operations which each complete atomically.
>
> or
If *or* was meant, wouldn't it be better just to say one or more
operations may be processed as one atomically in this situation?
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-10 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-26 13:38 [PATCH v6 00/10] block atomic writes John Garry
2024-03-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] block: Pass blk_queue_get_max_sectors() a request pointer John Garry
2024-04-10 22:58 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-03-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] block: Call blkdev_dio_unaligned() from blkdev_direct_IO() John Garry
2024-04-10 22:53 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 8:06 ` John Garry
2024-03-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] fs: Initial atomic write support John Garry
2024-03-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] fs: Add initial atomic write support info to statx John Garry
2024-03-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] block: Add core atomic write support John Garry
2024-03-26 17:11 ` Randy Dunlap
2024-04-10 23:34 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
2024-04-11 8:15 ` John Garry
2024-03-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] block: Add atomic write support for statx John Garry
2024-03-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] block: Add fops atomic write support John Garry
2024-03-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] scsi: sd: Atomic " John Garry
2024-03-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] scsi: scsi_debug: " John Garry
2024-03-26 13:38 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] nvme: " John Garry
2024-04-11 0:29 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 8:59 ` John Garry
2024-04-11 16:22 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 23:32 ` Dan Helmick
2024-03-27 3:50 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] block atomic writes Matthew Wilcox
2024-03-27 13:37 ` John Garry
2024-04-04 16:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-05 10:06 ` John Garry
2024-04-08 17:50 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-10 4:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-10 6:20 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-04-11 0:38 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-14 20:50 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-15 21:18 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-04-16 21:11 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-10 8:34 ` John Garry
2024-04-11 19:07 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-12 8:15 ` John Garry
2024-04-12 18:28 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-03-27 20:31 ` Dave Chinner
2024-04-05 10:20 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-04-05 10:55 ` John Garry
2024-04-05 6:14 ` Kent Overstreet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox