public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
	Kanchan Joshi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] io_uring: fix lost getsockopt completions
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 11:48:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff349cf0654018189b6077e85feed935f0f8839e.1721149870.git.asml.silence@gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 07:05:46PM +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> There is a report that iowq executed getsockopt never completes. The
> reason being that io_uring_cmd_sock() can return a positive result, and
> io_uring_cmd() propagates it back to core io_uring, instead of IOU_OK.
> In case of io_wq_submit_work(), the request will be dropped without
> completing it.
> 
> The offending code was introduced by a hack in
> a9c3eda7eada9 ("io_uring: fix submission-failure handling for uring-cmd"),
> however it was fine until getsockopt was introduced and started
> returning positive results.
> 
> The right solution is to always return IOU_OK, since
> e0b23d9953b0c ("io_uring: optimise ltimeout for inline execution"),
> we should be able to do it without problems, however for the sake of
> backporting and minimising side effects, let's keep returning negative
> return codes and otherwise do IOU_OK.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/axboe/liburing/issues/1181
> Cc: [email protected]
> Fixes: 8e9fad0e70b7b ("io_uring: Add io_uring command support for sockets")
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao <[email protected]>

Thanks for the fix.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-16 18:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-16 18:05 [PATCH 1/1] io_uring: fix lost getsockopt completions Pavel Begunkov
2024-07-16 18:48 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2024-07-18 20:34 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox