From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE3B516C687; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:03:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729101837; cv=none; b=DVyGHbEIHj/Hyw59SL9K/omUiqrmn9F9EcDtDqEgzyHqjzK7Ty/UZk70AKAyUTHUjW33za92LbCTL/HD12/3gjZfrNga2MTZuYmDZvXNvMHPOExJOUdMOtq5WkjLRppcLwLPi9gYXG0kpMUpULcxDFdUeGtygNrLcwcOrEFb6w8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729101837; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FfW6BMSQjS9cLZjwGvsIbkEwyd+h+0W9gybsj/7xrRM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=A1HH1bEkbofvJjPbcN4rfLL7b74kq3NOMIDLOtbWkTRchZsDsz8LcDTh1u055f0MJ9heMOfkSvQSR3wj2ReFg0XHG457u4EKKRp4iOT7xjL7JieBzzTEFRnohXTa2kU0CCpMLdovFqhG0s8XejGJTDGTudBY+Q3aFFdtdyBIsjA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=TuDATJsA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="TuDATJsA" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6429EC4CEC5; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:03:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729101837; bh=FfW6BMSQjS9cLZjwGvsIbkEwyd+h+0W9gybsj/7xrRM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=TuDATJsAFovwyNvQ34eIJZzZWrXhNLf5X8JgZkQZhoyEhqkvlKS/9kIjGba9VPe2O xBaXyAEB1gFN5Cpk2MuP6oFCFn8hHnc9LJeFqtxs5jyGYwtXPfe9tK1SmwMpeVraBp gL7irO9NPe8khmUsIIxsn/33iByg12ERL5Uf8pAA1y+luXUyiygjTLBlbrpf/H/kCT UpMUUmc4EJci4gEunUebQN8pg/qbleR3xVwIwPvRE+3UPu9o4bbSNnSrkGV9a4u8vs w3MbjTGEcL+2wZI9gBL10kyEScW7gG6EpwazzDaYcD02i52hQSNfgiMmTj+m8Dz1c+ ZUsd3R4FS03Tw== Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 12:03:53 -0600 From: Keith Busch To: Anuj Gupta Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, hch@lst.de, martin.petersen@oracle.com, asml.silence@gmail.com, anuj1072538@gmail.com, krisman@suse.de, io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, vishak.g@samsung.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] block: define set of integrity flags to be inherited by cloned bip Message-ID: References: <20241016112912.63542-1-anuj20.g@samsung.com> <20241016112912.63542-2-anuj20.g@samsung.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241016112912.63542-2-anuj20.g@samsung.com> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 04:59:02PM +0530, Anuj Gupta wrote: > Introduce BIP_CLONE_FLAGS describing integrity flags that should be > inherited in the cloned bip from the parent. Looks good. Reviewed-by: Keith Busch