From: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
To: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
Cc: Keith Busch <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected],
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 3/6] block: introduce max_write_hints queue limit
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 09:02:32 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxZtCFNvPlIE8xgV@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 09:18:34AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/17/24 9:09 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > Drivers with hardware that support write hints need a way to export how
> > many are available so applications can generically query this.
>
> Something is missing from this patch, namely a change for the SCSI disk
> (sd) driver that sets max_write_hints to sdkp->permanent_stream_count.
Shouldn't someone who cares about scsi do that? I certainly don't care,
nor have I been keeping up with what's happening there, so I'm also
unqualified.
> > +What: /sys/block/<disk>/queue/max_write_hints
> > +Date: October 2024
> > +Contact: [email protected]
> > +Description:
> > + [RO] Maximum number of write hints supported, 0 if not
> > + supported. If supported, valid values are 1 through
> > + max_write_hints, inclusive.
>
> That's a bit short. I think it would help to add a reference to the
> aspects of the standards related to this attribute: permanent streams
> for SCSI and FDP for NVMe.
The specs regarding write hints have not historically been stable, so
I'd rather not tie kernel docs to volatile external specifications.
> > diff --git a/block/blk-settings.c b/block/blk-settings.c
> > index a446654ddee5e..921fb4d334fa4 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ void blk_set_stacking_limits(struct queue_limits *lim)
> > lim->seg_boundary_mask = BLK_SEG_BOUNDARY_MASK;
> > /* Inherit limits from component devices */
> > + lim->max_write_hints = USHRT_MAX;
> > lim->max_segments = USHRT_MAX;
> > lim->max_discard_segments = USHRT_MAX;
> > lim->max_hw_sectors = UINT_MAX;
> > @@ -544,6 +545,8 @@ int blk_stack_limits(struct queue_limits *t, struct queue_limits *b,
> > t->max_segment_size = min_not_zero(t->max_segment_size,
> > b->max_segment_size);
> > + t->max_write_hints = min(t->max_write_hints, b->max_write_hints);
> > +
> > alignment = queue_limit_alignment_offset(b, start);
>
> I prefer that lim->max_write_hints is initialized to zero in
> blk_set_stacking_limits() and that blk_stack_limits() uses
> min_not_zero().
How is a device supposed to report it doesn't support a write hint if 0
gets overridden?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-21 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-17 16:09 [PATCHv8 0/6] write hints for nvme fdp Keith Busch
2024-10-17 16:09 ` [PATCHv8 1/6] block, fs: restore kiocb based write hint processing Keith Busch
2024-10-18 5:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-21 15:47 ` Keith Busch
2024-10-21 17:09 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-10-21 19:35 ` Keith Busch
2024-10-22 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-22 14:37 ` Keith Busch
2024-10-22 14:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-18 16:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-10-17 16:09 ` [PATCHv8 2/6] block: use generic u16 for write hints Keith Busch
2024-10-18 5:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-24 19:45 ` Keith Busch
2024-10-25 12:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-18 6:00 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-10-18 16:12 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-10-21 15:03 ` Keith Busch
2024-10-17 16:09 ` [PATCHv8 3/6] block: introduce max_write_hints queue limit Keith Busch
2024-10-18 5:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-18 6:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-10-18 16:18 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-10-21 15:02 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2024-10-17 16:09 ` [PATCHv8 4/6] fs: introduce per-io hint support flag Keith Busch
2024-10-18 5:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-18 6:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-10-17 16:09 ` [PATCHv8 5/6] io_uring: enable per-io hinting capability Keith Busch
2024-10-18 5:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-10-18 6:03 ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-10-17 16:09 ` [PATCHv8 6/6] nvme: enable FDP support Keith Busch
2024-10-18 10:48 ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-10-21 15:08 ` Keith Busch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxZtCFNvPlIE8xgV@kbusch-mbp \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox