From: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: change io_get_ext_arg() to uaccess begin + end
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 16:40:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zxgp9uPGPJZijSoq@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 02:39:03PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> In scenarios where a high frequency of wait events are seen, the copy
> of the struct io_uring_getevents_arg is quite noticeable in the
> profiles in terms of time spent. It can be seen as up to 3.5-4.5%.
> Rewrite the copy-in logic, saving about 0.5% of the time.
I'm surprised it's faster to retrieve field by field instead of a
straight copy. But you can't argue with the results!
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
> ---
> io_uring/io_uring.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> index 8952453ea807..612e7d66f845 100644
> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
> @@ -3239,6 +3239,7 @@ static int io_validate_ext_arg(unsigned flags, const void __user *argp, size_t a
> static int io_get_ext_arg(unsigned flags, const void __user *argp,
> struct ext_arg *ext_arg)
> {
> + const struct io_uring_getevents_arg __user *uarg = argp;
> struct io_uring_getevents_arg arg;
>
> /*
> @@ -3256,8 +3257,13 @@ static int io_get_ext_arg(unsigned flags, const void __user *argp,
> */
> if (ext_arg->argsz != sizeof(arg))
> return -EINVAL;
> - if (copy_from_user(&arg, argp, sizeof(arg)))
> + if (!user_access_begin(uarg, sizeof(*uarg)))
> return -EFAULT;
> + unsafe_get_user(arg.sigmask, &uarg->sigmask, uaccess_end);
> + unsafe_get_user(arg.min_wait_usec, &uarg->min_wait_usec, uaccess_end);
> + unsafe_get_user(arg.ts, &uarg->ts, uaccess_end);
> + unsafe_get_user(arg.sigmask_sz, &uarg->sigmask_sz, uaccess_end);
> + user_access_end();
> ext_arg->min_time = arg.min_wait_usec * NSEC_PER_USEC;
> ext_arg->sig = u64_to_user_ptr(arg.sigmask);
> ext_arg->argsz = arg.sigmask_sz;
> @@ -3267,6 +3273,9 @@ static int io_get_ext_arg(unsigned flags, const void __user *argp,
> ext_arg->ts_set = true;
> }
> return 0;
> +uaccess_end:
> + user_access_end();
> + return -EFAULT;
> }
I was looking for the 'goto' for this label and discovered it's in the
macro. Neat.
Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <[email protected]>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-22 22:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-22 20:39 [PATCHSET RFC 0/3] Add support for registered waits Jens Axboe
2024-10-22 20:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] io_uring: switch struct ext_arg from __kernel_timespec to timespec64 Jens Axboe
2024-10-22 20:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] io_uring: change io_get_ext_arg() to uaccess begin + end Jens Axboe
2024-10-22 22:40 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2024-10-23 1:11 ` Jens Axboe
2024-10-22 20:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] io_uring: add support for fixed wait regions Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zxgp9uPGPJZijSoq@kbusch-mbp \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox