public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: io-uring <[email protected]>,
	Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
	[email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] io_uring: extend io_uring_sqe flags bits
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2024 10:42:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyRAKm0IQV7wWjhC@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZyQ5CcwfLhaASvMz@fedora>

On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 10:12:25AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 03:22:18PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > In hindsight everything is clearer, but it probably should've been known
> > that 8 bits of ->flags would run out sooner than later. Rather than
> > gobble up the last bit for a random use case, add a bit that controls
> > whether or not ->personality is used as a flags2 argument. If that is
> > the case, then there's a new IOSQE2_PERSONALITY flag that tells io_uring
> > which personality field to read.
> > 
> > While this isn't the prettiest, it does allow extending with 15 extra
> > flags, and retains being able to use personality with any kind of
> > command. The exception is uring cmd, where personality2 will overlap
> > with the space set aside for SQE128. If they really need that, then that
> 
> The space is the 1st `short` for uring_cmd, instead of SQE128 only.
> 
> Also it is overlapped with ->optval and ->addr3, so just wondering why not
> use ->__pad2?
> 
> Another ways is to use __pad2 for sqe2_flags for non-uring_cmd, and for
> uring_cmd, use its top 16 as sqe2_flags, this way does work, but it is
> just a bit ugly to use.

Also IOSQE2_PERSONALITY doesn't have to be per-SQE, and it can be one
feature of IORING_FEAT_IOSQE2_PERSONALITY, that is why I thought it is
fine to take the 7th bit as SQE_GROUP now.

Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-01  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-31 21:22 [PATCH RFC] io_uring: extend io_uring_sqe flags bits Jens Axboe
2024-11-01  2:12 ` Ming Lei
2024-11-01  2:42   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2024-11-01 13:59     ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-01 14:34       ` Ming Lei
2024-11-01 14:42         ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-01 15:01           ` Ming Lei
2024-11-01 15:04             ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-01 16:55           ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-11-01 16:58             ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-01 13:58   ` Jens Axboe
2024-11-01 16:59 ` Pavel Begunkov
2024-11-01 17:05   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZyRAKm0IQV7wWjhC@fedora \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox