From: Olivier Langlois <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>,
Jens Axboe <[email protected]>,
[email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] io_uring: Fix race condition when sqp thread goes to sleep
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 09:52:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 00:03 +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 6/22/21 11:42 PM, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 18:37 -0400, Olivier Langlois wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2021-06-22 at 21:45 +0100, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I can do that if you want but considering that the function is
> > > inline
> > > and the race condition is a relatively rare occurence, is the
> > > cost
> > > coming with inline expansion really worth it in this case?
> > > >
> > On hand, there is the inline expansion concern.
> >
> > OTOH, the benefit of going with your suggestion is that completions
> > generally precedes new submissions so yes, it might be better that
> > way.
> >
> > I'm really unsure about this. I'm just raising the concern and I'll
> > let
> > you make the final decision...
>
> It seems it may actually loop infinitely until it gets a signal,
> so yes. And even if not, rare stalls are nasty, they will ruin
> some 9s of latency and hard to catch.
>
> That part is quite cold anyway, would generate some extra cold
> instructions, meh
>
I'm not 100% sure to see the infinite loop possibility but I guess that
with some badly placed preemptions, it could take few iterations before
entering the block:
if (sqt_spin || !time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
So I will go ahead with your suggestion.
I'll retest the new patch version (it should be a formality) and I'll
resend an update once done.
Greetings,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-23 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-22 18:45 [PATCH 0/2] Minor SQPOLL thread fix and improvement Olivier Langlois, Olivier Langlois
2021-06-22 18:45 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: Fix race condition when sqp thread goes to sleep Olivier Langlois
2021-06-22 18:53 ` Olivier Langlois
2021-06-22 18:55 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-22 19:07 ` Olivier Langlois
[not found] ` <[email protected]>
2021-06-22 20:45 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-22 22:37 ` Olivier Langlois
2021-06-22 22:42 ` Olivier Langlois
2021-06-22 23:03 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-23 13:52 ` Olivier Langlois [this message]
2021-06-23 15:58 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-06-22 18:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: Create define to modify a SQPOLL parameter Olivier Langlois
2021-06-22 20:58 ` Pavel Begunkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2ade714df72c0adeb19897811133a0e0244a729.camel@trillion01.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox