From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH io_uring-5.14 v2] io_uring: remove double poll wait entry for pure poll
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 14:06:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
在 2021/7/28 上午6:46, Jens Axboe 写道:
> On 7/26/21 8:39 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
>> 在 2021/7/26 下午8:40, Pavel Begunkov 写道:
>>> On 7/24/21 5:48 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
>>>> 在 2021/7/23 下午10:31, Pavel Begunkov 写道:
>>>>> On 7/23/21 10:22 AM, Hao Xu wrote:
>>>>>> For pure poll requests, we should remove the double poll wait entry.
>>>>>> And io_poll_remove_double() is good enough for it compared with
>>>>>> io_poll_remove_waitqs().
>>>>>
>>>>> 5.14 in the subject hints me that it's a fix. Is it?
>>>>> Can you add what it fixes or expand on why it's better?
>>>> Hi Pavel, I found that for poll_add() requests, it doesn't remove the
>>>> double poll wait entry when it's done, neither after vfs_poll() or in
>>>> the poll completion handler. The patch is mainly to fix it.
>>>
>>> Ok, sounds good. Please resend with updated description, and
>>> let's add some tags.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 88e41cf928a6 ("io_uring: add multishot mode for IORING_OP_POLL_ADD")
>>> Cc: [email protected] # 5.13+
>>>
>>> Also, I'd prefer the commit title to make more clear that it's a
>>> fix. E.g. "io_uring: fix poll requests leaking second poll entries".
>>>
>>> Btw, seems it should fix hangs in ./poll-mshot-update
>> Sure,I'll send v3 soon, sorry for my unprofessionalism..
>
> Are you going to send out v3?
>
v3 sent. Btw I'm working on letting fast poll support multishot,
I believe that will benefit non-persistent programming, let's see
if it helps accept().
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-28 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-23 9:22 [PATCH io_uring-5.14 v2] io_uring: remove double poll wait entry for pure poll Hao Xu
2021-07-23 14:31 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-07-23 16:22 ` Jens Axboe
2021-07-24 4:48 ` Hao Xu
2021-07-26 12:40 ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-07-26 14:39 ` Hao Xu
2021-07-27 22:46 ` Jens Axboe
2021-07-28 6:06 ` Hao Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2c176ac-99b3-c95d-18f2-60c621419c26@linux.alibaba.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox