public inbox for io-uring@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>,
	io-uring <io-uring@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] io_uring: ensure deferred completions are flushed for multishot
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 08:58:33 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a4ef2e70-e858-4a3a-9f7a-22bd3af2fefe@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c6260e33-ad29-4cd1-85c1-d0658c347a31@gmail.com>

On 5/7/25 8:36 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 5/7/25 14:56, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> Multishot normally uses io_req_post_cqe() to post completions, but when
>> stopping it, it may finish up with a deferred completion. This is fine,
>> except if another multishot event triggers before the deferred completions
>> get flushed. If this occurs, then CQEs may get reordered in the CQ ring,
>> as new multishot completions get posted before the deferred ones are
>> flushed. This can cause confusion on the application side, if strict
>> ordering is required for the use case.
>>
>> When multishot posting via io_req_post_cqe(), flush any pending deferred
>> completions first, if any.
>>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
>> Reported-by: Norman Maurer <norman_maurer@apple.com>
>> Reported-by: Christian Mazakas <christian.mazakas@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
>> index 769814d71153..541e65a1eebf 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
>> @@ -848,6 +848,14 @@ bool io_req_post_cqe(struct io_kiocb *req, s32 res, u32 cflags)
>>       struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
>>       bool posted;
>>   +    /*
>> +     * If multishot has already posted deferred completions, ensure that
>> +     * those are flushed first before posting this one. If not, CQEs
>> +     * could get reordered.
>> +     */
>> +    if (!wq_list_empty(&ctx->submit_state.compl_reqs))
>> +        __io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
> 
> A request is already dead if it's in compl_reqs, there should be no
> way io_req_post_cqe() is called with it. Is it reordering of CQEs
> belonging to the same request? And what do you mean by "deferred"
> completions?

It's not the same req, it's different requests using the same
provided buffer ring where it can be problematic.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-07 14:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-07 13:56 [PATCH] io_uring: ensure deferred completions are flushed for multishot Jens Axboe
2025-05-07 14:36 ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-07 14:58   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2025-05-07 15:11     ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-07 15:26       ` Jens Axboe
2025-05-07 15:46         ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-07 15:49           ` Jens Axboe
2025-05-07 16:18             ` Pavel Begunkov
2025-05-07 17:51               ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a4ef2e70-e858-4a3a-9f7a-22bd3af2fefe@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox