public inbox for [email protected]
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
To: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>, Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Joseph Qi <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: add uring_lock as an argument to io_sqe_files_unregister()
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:34:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>

在 2021/2/4 上午12:33, Pavel Begunkov 写道:
> On 03/02/2021 14:57, Hao Xu wrote:
>> io_sqe_files_unregister is currently called from several places:
>>      - syscall io_uring_register (with uring_lock)
>>      - io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill() (without uring_lock)
>>
>> There is a AA type deadlock in io_sqe_files_unregister(), thus we need
>> to know if we hold uring_lock in io_sqe_files_unregister() to fix the
>> issue.
> 
> It's ugly, just take the lock and kill the patch. There can't be any
> contention during io_ring_ctx_free anyway.
Hi Pavel, I don't get it, do you mean this patch isn't needed, and we 
can just unlock(&uring_lock) before io_run_task_work_sig() and 
lock(&uring_lock) after it? I knew there won't be contention during 
io_ring_ctx_free that's why there is no uring_lock in it.
I tried to just do unlock(&uring_lock) before io_run_task_sig() without 
if(locked) check, it reports something like "there are unpaired mutex 
lock/unlock" since we cannot just unlock if it's from io_ring_ctx_free.
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>   fs/io_uring.c | 10 +++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
>> index 38c6cbe1ab38..efb6d02fea6f 100644
>> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
>> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
>> @@ -7339,7 +7339,7 @@ static void io_sqe_files_set_node(struct fixed_file_data *file_data,
>>   	percpu_ref_get(&file_data->refs);
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int io_sqe_files_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>> +static int io_sqe_files_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, bool locked)
>>   {
>>   	struct fixed_file_data *data = ctx->file_data;
>>   	struct fixed_file_ref_node *backup_node, *ref_node = NULL;
>> @@ -7872,13 +7872,13 @@ static int io_sqe_files_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg,
>>   
>>   	ret = io_sqe_files_scm(ctx);
>>   	if (ret) {
>> -		io_sqe_files_unregister(ctx);
>> +		io_sqe_files_unregister(ctx, true);
>>   		return ret;
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	ref_node = alloc_fixed_file_ref_node(ctx);
>>   	if (!ref_node) {
>> -		io_sqe_files_unregister(ctx);
>> +		io_sqe_files_unregister(ctx, true);
>>   		return -ENOMEM;
>>   	}
>>   
>> @@ -8682,7 +8682,7 @@ static void io_ring_ctx_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
>>   		css_put(ctx->sqo_blkcg_css);
>>   #endif
>>   
>> -	io_sqe_files_unregister(ctx);
>> +	io_sqe_files_unregister(ctx, false);
>>   	io_eventfd_unregister(ctx);
>>   	io_destroy_buffers(ctx);
>>   	idr_destroy(&ctx->personality_idr);
>> @@ -10065,7 +10065,7 @@ static int __io_uring_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned opcode,
>>   		ret = -EINVAL;
>>   		if (arg || nr_args)
>>   			break;
>> -		ret = io_sqe_files_unregister(ctx);
>> +		ret = io_sqe_files_unregister(ctx, true);
>>   		break;
>>   	case IORING_REGISTER_FILES_UPDATE:
>>   		ret = io_sqe_files_update(ctx, arg, nr_args);
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-04  3:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-03 14:57 [PATCH 0/2] fix deadlock in __io_req_task_submit() Hao Xu
2021-02-03 14:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] io_uring: add uring_lock as an argument to io_sqe_files_unregister() Hao Xu
2021-02-03 16:33   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04  3:34     ` Hao Xu [this message]
2021-02-04 11:11       ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 14:49         ` Jens Axboe
2021-02-03 14:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] io_uring: don't hold uring_lock when calling io_run_task_work* Hao Xu
2021-02-03 16:35   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-03 16:45     ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04  3:25       ` Hao Xu
2021-02-04 11:17         ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-04 15:26           ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-05  9:57             ` Hao Xu
2021-02-05 10:18               ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-06 11:34                 ` Hao Xu
2021-02-07 17:16                   ` Pavel Begunkov
2021-02-06 16:21                 ` Hao Xu
2021-02-11 13:30                 ` Hao Xu
2021-02-05 10:03       ` Hao Xu
2021-02-04 11:33   ` Pavel Begunkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a6827c98-c4f6-a0fd-6453-1351c654c3a5@linux.alibaba.com \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    [email protected] \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox