From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C30FC433F5 for ; Thu, 5 May 2022 18:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234315AbiEESkW (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2022 14:40:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38150 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1385218AbiEESjr (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 May 2022 14:39:47 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 263A160ABB for ; Thu, 5 May 2022 11:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id c1-20020a17090a558100b001dca2694f23so4698587pji.3 for ; Thu, 05 May 2022 11:29:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel-dk.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject:content-language :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qJDsBNaU0WtP3zGJAVGJc1XV1UGinZSSPR/pmXCT3fg=; b=MsfJI7wgJazaq5lFNIqyg/2hjMk8meBjzjrd37sw7/Yk7hKbq6mcHgHKyfNrzPrwpo 0E1Rhuc4JhEujqO3Ymm23DCQb1xvZhdoYQeeH+XZVHL1soFc+SIj43noHv6Iy8jJGrZF sh/+BF52lPIHxSSD0OLbL2P8hDReNZAUe/tmmvkUFfLQmKVNzbZP38QmNZXhrU+cy72m 52jkMVElSfjXcglvj6sKvuLxDlZCb5KBH9dMTxZPfZSUn45mMeDk/RphA3UbmnpfW/3n KegiPP91o1WbPuGBlYgwClPlgjyMZJecmcGFZhwF7/JWNOflDDtINsW2zLF48xa8I5+y HXYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qJDsBNaU0WtP3zGJAVGJc1XV1UGinZSSPR/pmXCT3fg=; b=Xl64KZW0wOC+Vsp9GEw7bbrL02BKWlyIbDMBEII9FLgTf1L4N4YJhiW4iRcP5dcms1 8iLUZWot5Ue9zJjMNOCmCwZS+tx76LuAOGdg0N4v0ATyK0kQFDyHOcpitdg99mjRddpy ZbyDGS/5iQ5S4YMuVjn59ScOH3RjO5wIurcZnzPOHSkFhAYO05NnveEkGOs55xTMTBmq LJ6n2mL7ID8Gsr6ry5n1wqWBPsAtHgJuY4c0NhBpqGYNcwRdAr3Y9XhXaF69opTdTv3z 4hO93ncna+I8S+mbAcC7jekOzEm9w1pfL56Fi0/s0NngAuwIQjLyOavf8AvZC01BBmHZ i+Sg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532nf9SISAyS9+BCuTHrNzH2jAWUPm4QDN5kI2b3hvEvrnWjtUBB k/fm2b38VoajfapxEMOwmXKWGQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzkMXHdKGEICRUdE4gyAEM++LbBaogm7oaZDoNke0R5SMMnkNorn/rvTJeSWr6sGKgr+fDWxw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:dad2:b0:15e:9faa:e924 with SMTP id q18-20020a170902dad200b0015e9faae924mr23518649plx.94.1651775369465; Thu, 05 May 2022 11:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.4.166] (cpe-72-132-29-68.dc.res.rr.com. [72.132.29.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e14-20020a17090301ce00b0015e8d4eb1d3sm1934883plh.29.2022.05.05.11.29.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 May 2022 11:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 May 2022 12:29:27 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux aarch64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] io_uring passthrough for nvme Content-Language: en-US From: Jens Axboe To: Kanchan Joshi , hch@lst.de Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, asml.silence@gmail.com, ming.lei@redhat.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, shr@fb.com, joshiiitr@gmail.com, anuj20.g@samsung.com, gost.dev@samsung.com References: <20220505060616.803816-1-joshi.k@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: io-uring@vger.kernel.org On 5/5/22 12:20 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 5/5/22 12:06 AM, Kanchan Joshi wrote: >> This iteration is against io_uring-big-sqe brach (linux-block). >> On top of a739b2354 ("io_uring: enable CQE32"). >> >> fio testing branch: >> https://github.com/joshkan/fio/tree/big-cqe-pt.v4 > > I folded in the suggested changes, the branch is here: > > https://git.kernel.dk/cgit/linux-block/log/?h=for-5.19/io_uring-passthrough > > I'll try and run the fio test branch, but please take a look and see what > you think. Tested that fio branch and it works for me with what I had pushed out. Also tested explicit deferral of requests. -- Jens Axboe