From: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: [PATCH for-next 7/7] io_uring: return normal tw run linking optimisation
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:37:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a7ed5ede84de190832cc33ebbcdd6e91cd90f5b6.1674484266.git.asml.silence@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
io_submit_flush_completions() may produce new task_work items, so it's a
good idea to recheck the task_work list after flushing completions. The
optimisation is not new and was accidentially removed by
f88262e60bb9 ("io_uring: lockless task list")
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
---
io_uring/io_uring.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/io_uring/io_uring.c b/io_uring/io_uring.c
index 586e70f686ce..8c4d92e64c20 100644
--- a/io_uring/io_uring.c
+++ b/io_uring/io_uring.c
@@ -1238,6 +1238,15 @@ void tctx_task_work(struct callback_head *cb)
loops++;
node = io_llist_xchg(&tctx->task_list, &fake);
count += handle_tw_list(node, &ctx, &uring_locked, &fake);
+
+ /* skip expensive cmpxchg if there are items in the list */
+ if (READ_ONCE(tctx->task_list.first) != &fake)
+ continue;
+ if (uring_locked && !wq_list_empty(&ctx->submit_state.compl_reqs)) {
+ io_submit_flush_completions(ctx);
+ if (READ_ONCE(tctx->task_list.first) != &fake)
+ continue;
+ }
node = io_llist_cmpxchg(&tctx->task_list, &fake, NULL);
} while (node != &fake);
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-23 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-23 14:37 [PATCH for-next 0/7] normal tw optimisation + refactoring Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-23 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next 1/7] io_uring: use user visible tail in io_uring_poll() Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-23 18:25 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-23 20:56 ` Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-23 21:09 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-23 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next 2/7] io_uring: kill outdated comment about overflow flush Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-23 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next 3/7] io_uring: improve io_get_sqe Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-23 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next 4/7] io_uring: refactor req allocation Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-23 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next 5/7] io_uring: refactor io_put_task helpers Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-23 14:37 ` [PATCH for-next 6/7] io_uring: refactor tctx_task_work Pavel Begunkov
2023-01-23 14:37 ` Pavel Begunkov [this message]
2023-01-23 21:14 ` [PATCH for-next 0/7] normal tw optimisation + refactoring Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a7ed5ede84de190832cc33ebbcdd6e91cd90f5b6.1674484266.git.asml.silence@gmail.com \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
[email protected] \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox